[j-nsp] Reliability of M20 chassis ?

[harry]

I think you meant an *M40e* chassis.

The main point to the M40e is the redundant control and forwarding
capabilities that you mention. As the M40 had neither, this is a
significant improvement. This is not to say that the M40 is broken.
Redundancy is an insurance policy. Whether you feel the premiums is
worth the peace of mind is a matter of personal choice.

My understanding is that M40s were often deployed in pairs to achieve
redundancy. A single M40e has to be a better solution, and the M40 is
now EOL anyway. I believe that an M40e can be bought w/o redundant RE
and SFM.

I think that MTBF numbers are posted at the public website. Check out
the edit snip below. Now that is a reliable box!

[clip]

> bla at xxxxx> show system uptime
> Current time:      2003-09-18 19:06:29 UTC
> System booted:     2001-09-10 18:30:05 UTC (105w3d 00:36 ago)
> Protocols started: 2001-09-10 18:29:08 UTC (105w3d 00:37 ago)
> Last configured:   2003-09-18 06:13:40 UTC (12:52:49 ago)
>  7:06PM  up 738 days, 36 mins, 1 user, load averages: 0.02, 0.03, 0.00
		  ^^^^^^
>
> bla at xxxxx> show version brief
> Hostname: XXXXX
> Model: m40 <<<<<
> JUNOS base [4.2R3]
> JUNOS Kernel Software Suite [4.2-20010502-ot7565]
> JUNOS Routing Software Suite [4.2-20010502-ot7565]
> JUNOS Packet Forwarding Engine Support [4.2-20010502-ot7565] JUNOS 
> Online Documentation Files [4.2-20010502-ot7565]



HTHs.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of joe mcguckin
> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 3:21 PM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Reliability of M20 chassis ?
> 
> 
> I notice that Juniper came out with the M20e chassis which
> can accept a redundant route engine and switch fabric board.
> 
> Has this been a real problem that required a fix? Or is this
> a feature that rarely is used, but makes owners feel more secure?
> 
> There must still be a lot of original M40's out there. Are
> they running ok or are carriers replacing them with M40e's ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Joe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/junipe> r-nsp
>