[j-nsp] L2 VPN question

[Martin Mogensen]

Gary's solutions is what I had in mind. It's exactly the same config as 
we use for ethernet interfaces if you replace "frame-relay" with "vlan", 
"dlci" with "vlan" and add vlan-tagging on the physical interface.

Laura,
Are you using dlci's from the correct ranges? (1-511 for the IP unit and 
512+ for the PE-CE unit).
/martin

Gary Tate wrote:

> I'm not sure what you mean by impossible. Maybe you can send the  
> configuration you are trying and the version of JunOS
> 
> [edit]
> gtate at vpn02# show interfaces so-2/1/0
> encapsulation frame-relay-ccc;
> unit 101 {
>     dlci 101;
>     family inet {
>         address 1.1.1.1/30;
>     }
> }
> unit 512 {
>     encapsulation frame-relay-ccc;
>     dlci 512;
> }
> 
> [edit]
> gtate at vpn02# commit
> commit complete
> 
> This works fine.
> Gary
> 
> On Aug 5, 2004, at 3:59 AM, Laura Serrano wrote:
> 
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> this is Laura, from rediris. As Miguel Angel tells you, we want to 
>> use  the same link between CE and PE router for the IP and l2 circuit  
>> traffic.
>>
>> Please, correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>> For definition, we need to configure an CCC circuit between CE and PE  
>> router, don't we?. Well, we are currently defining a test VPN 
>> scenario  in our production network without affecting to the IP 
>> traffic, that  is: to use the same SONET link (PE-CE) to IP and 
>> l2circuit traffic.
>>
>> I am trying to configure different units under the same physical  
>> interface, but we have a problem:
>>
>> At the physical level we can configure framerelay-ccc, ciscohdlc-ccc  
>> and ppp-ccc, but if you choose any of *.ccc encapsulations at this  
>> level, you can't configure family inet in the logical unit interface.
>>
>> Another possibility, I thought about, is to configure "frame-relay" 
>> at  the physical level and define two different logical unit, one for 
>> IP  traffic and frame-relay encapsulation and other for l2circuit 
>> with  frame-relay-ccc encapsulation, but it is impossible too :-/
>>
>> Any comment, any idea, any options? Thanks in advanced
>>
>> Regards!
>>
>> -- Laura
>>
>>
>>
>> Martin Mogensen wrote:
>>
>>> Miguel Angel Sotos wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,     we are configuring some L2VPN stuff in Juniper routers.
>>>>
>>>> There's a POS interface between PE end CE.
>>>> Can we use (we are using Martini) in the same POS interface, *-ccc  
>>>> encapsulation and other type of encapsulations that permits
>>>> familiy inet ??
>>>> In that case, which one?
>>>>
>>>> Or, have I to use the whole interface for ccc based VPNs??
>>>> (and not IP traffic)??
>>>>
>>>> At the end, what i want to do is to use
>>>> at the same time L2 circuits and L3 family inet traffic in the same  
>>>> interface.
>>>>
>>>> Is it possible? or maybe i'm conceptually wrong.....
>>>
>>> We have deployed this type of Martini layer 2 circuits with both IP  
>>> and layer2 circuit terminations on the same physical interface  
>>> towards a CE, but we have only used GE/10GE interfaces and vlan-ccc  
>>> encapsulation so far. Using POS interfaces is more tricky.
>>> In order to run both IP traffic and to terminate one or more layer2  
>>> circuit on the same physical interface you need to use an  
>>> encapsulation type that support the use of more than one unit  
>>> (subinterface) on the physical interface. You can then use one unit  
>>> for IP and one or more to units for CCC to enable layer2 circuit  
>>> terminations towards the CE.
>>> Note that there are limitations on which unit numbers you can use  
>>> with CCC - some units will be reserved when you apply *-ccc  
>>> encapsulatiom on the physical interface:
>>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos61/feature-guide 
>>> -61/html/fg-l2circuit6.html For POS, you should be able to use  
>>> frame-relay-ccc encapsulation to acheive what you need if you would  
>>> like to go that way.
>>> /martin
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
> 
>