[j-nsp] hidden bgp route
Bosco Sachanandani
Bosco.Sachanandani at orange.co.in
Thu Jan 8 06:49:05 EST 2004
hi,
As asked by some of you, maybe this is more helpful. Also, do I need to set the next-hop self option in this case on my router?
admin at srmum1-re0> show route table Gp_VRF hidden extensive
Gp_VRF.inet.0: 513 destinations, 524 routes (512 active, 0 holddown, 2 hidden)
202.123.213.80/28 (2 entries, 1 announced)
TSI:
Page 0 idx 1 Type 1 val 88002d8
Nexthop: 213.181.39.20
AS path: 6774 19440 I
Communities:
Page 0 idx 5 Type 1 val 8a93b7c
Nexthop: 213.181.39.20
Localpref: 100
AS path: 6774 19440 I
Communities:
Path 202.123.213.80 from 213.181.39.20 Vector len 4. Val: 1 5
KRT in-kernel 202.123.213.80/28 -> {indirect(393)}
BGP Preference: 170/-101
Next hop type: Unusable
State: <Hidden Ext>
Inactive reason: Unusable path
Local AS: 64721 Peer AS: 19440
Age: 1d 5:19:26 Metric: 0
Task: BGP_19440_64721.202.123.213.83+179
AS path: 19440 I
Localpref: 100
Router ID: 192.168.4.1
Indirect next hops: 1
Protocol next hop: 202.123.213.83 Indirect next hop: 0 -
202.123.213.80/28 Originating RIB: Gp_VRF.inet.0
Node path count: 1
Indirect nexthops: 1
Protocol Nexthop: 213.181.39.20
Indirect nexthop: 86d1000 393
Indirect path forwarding nexthops: 1
Nexthop: 213.181.39.25 via fe-0/3/1.3
0.0.0.0/0 Originating RIB: Gp_VRF.inet.0
Node path count: 1
Forwarding nexthops: 1
Nexthop: 213.181.39.25 via fe-0/3/1.3
213.181.39.0/24 (1 entry, 0 announced)
BGP Preference: 170/-101
Next hop type: Unusable
State: <Hidden Ext>
Local AS: 64721 Peer AS: 6774
Age: 1d 5:21:07
Task: BGP_6774_64721.213.181.39.20+179
AS path: 6774 I (Atomic)Aggregator: 6774 213.181.59.92
Localpref: 100
Router ID: 213.181.58.132
Indirect next hops: 1
Protocol next hop: 213.181.39.20 Indirect next hop: 0 -
0.0.0.0/0 Originating RIB: Gp_VRF.inet.0
Node path count: 1
Forwarding nexthops: 1
Nexthop: 213.181.39.25 via fe-0/3/1.3
Probably you're not setting next-hop to self for these prefixes...
Please provide extensive info.
>admin at srmum1-re0> show route table Gp_VRF hidden extensive
cu
Anton
At 11:37 AM 1/8/2004 +0530, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>Need a small piece of info. I am running BGP with 2 upstream GRX
>providers. I am recieving all routes correctly from them except the ones
>mentioned below.
>
>It turns out that these prefixes are the GRX provider's network prefix's
>itself. Since it does not get installed in the route table, I have to put
>in static routes to access stuff like the their DNS servers which are part
>of these subnets, which is not a very nice thing to do.
>
>My query in general is that what are "hidden" routes? I am using an M20
>with JunOS , the upstream provider is using a Cisco 7000 series box. There
>are NO inbound BGP policies at my end.
>
>The GRX guys cannot seem to figure out why this is happening.
>
>thanks.
>
>
>admin at srmum1-re0> show route table Gp_VRF hidden
>
>Gp_VRF.inet.0: 514 destinations, 525 routes (513 active, 0 holddown, 2 hidden)
>+ = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
>
>202.123.213.80/28 [BGP/170] 23:37:07, MED 0, localpref 100, from
>202.123.213.83
> AS path: 19440 I
> Unusable
>213.181.39.0/24 [BGP/170] 23:38:48, localpref 100, from 213.181.39.20
> AS path: 6774 I
> Unusable
>
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list