[j-nsp] frame-relay encap on POS between Juniper and Cisco
R Che
jlablab at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 20 22:28:08 EDT 2004
Yes, that's the answer. Thanks.
"K.K. Verma" <kkverma at juniper.net> wrote:
Hi,
Please remove "no keepalive" configuration from Cisco POS. It should be:
interface POS8/1/0
no ip address
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
no ip mroute-cache
crc 32
pos scramble-atm
pos flag c2 22
!
interface POS8/1/0.100 point-to-point
ip address 81.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 100
!
Hope, it will make ping to work. Juniper interface configuration looks fine.
Thanks,
KK
R Che wrote:
>I configured frame relay encapsulation on POS interface between Juniper and Cisco routers. physical layer is up, but my pings don't get through. When I changed to ppp or cisco-hdlc, pings went through. so I don't think there is an issue with sonet layer.
>
>here is my config on Juniper:
>dce;
>clocking internal;
>encapsulation frame-relay;
>sonet-options {
> rfc-2615;
>}
>unit 100 {
> point-to-point;
> dlci 100;
> family inet {
> address 81.1.1.2/24;
> }
>}
>
>and this is my config on Cisco:
>interface POS8/1/0
> no ip address
> encapsulation frame-relay IETF
> no ip mroute-cache
> no keepalive
> crc 32
> pos scramble-atm
> pos flag c2 22
>!
>interface POS8/1/0.100 point-to-point
> ip address 81.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
> no keepalive
> frame-relay interface-dlci 100
>!
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list