[j-nsp] Pepsi I presume?

[Pekka Savola]

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, joe mcguckin wrote:
> The 90Mbit number is an odd value. Is this simply 45Mbits * 2 (e.g. A full
> duplex DS3 connection counted as twice the bandwidth). If so, it seems that
> J's marketing dept has sunk to the depth's of Cisco's...

Not really.  The box has two DS3 uplinks, so it should be able to use 
both :)

The same applies to the smallest Pepsi box.  I think it was 4 Mbit/s
in the literature, which is 2 x E1, and it has two upstream interfaces
as well..

> On 6/16/04 3:16 PM, "Richard A Steenbergen" <ras at e-gerbil.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 09:23:42AM -0700, Richmond, Jeff (ELI) wrote:
> >> Hmm, not sure what you folks were expecting, but these boxes fit the space
> >> we were looking for, such as a 2600/1700 competitor for T-1 router services
> >> and as a 7200 competitor for the ds-3 router space. We have quite a few
> >> managed routers deployed for our customers, and if nothing else, this gives
> >> us another option going forward.
> > 
> > I believe people were looking forward to a low cost FastE capable router,
> > aka a production olive, not just a cisco-copycat T1 CPE box.
> 
> 

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings