[j-nsp] Connecting Juniper LX to Cisco 6500 LX over short distance

Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) jf at probe-networks.de
Fri Mar 5 14:16:29 EST 2004


Hi,

i can confirm, too, that Juniper LH to Cisco LX/LH works mostly fine. In
some cases we had to use 10db attenuators because we had alot input
errors on the Cisco side.

Speaking of the LH, does anyone have a Juniper LH to Juniper LX running?
Wonder if it'll do.

Regards,
Jonas


On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 19:54, Rod Oliver wrote:
> No, but we done a lot of Cisco LX to LX over the sort of distances you refer
> to, without ever having a problem. Looking at the specs of a Juniper GE-LX
> PIC would suggest no differently, both have a maximum launch powre of -3dBm
> and receiver saturation of -3dBM, meaning that even if you had zero
> attenuation across the span you should have no problems.
> 
> Cheers Rod
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> > [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Matt Lessins
> > Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 6:41 PM
> > To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Subject: [j-nsp] Connecting Juniper LX to Cisco 6500 LX over 
> > short distance
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > Has anybody connected a GigE LX interface (M160) to a Cisco 
> > 1000BASE-LX/LH GBIC (WS-G5486) in a 6500 over a short 
> > distance (rack to rack)?  I'm worried about destroying optics 
> > or at least having it work correctly.  Thanks,
> > 
> > Matt
> > 
> > --
> > Matt Lessins
> > Wayne State University
> > Network Engineer
> > (313) 577-2176 : Phone
> > (313) 577-5577 : FAX
> > m_lessins at wayne.edu
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net 
> > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list