[j-nsp] policy based routing, rib-groups and issues...

[Bill Petrisko]

On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 09:56:51AM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 12:45:28AM -0700, Bill Petrisko wrote:
> > routing-instances {
> >     peerX {
> >         instance-type forwarding;
> >         routing-options {
> >             static {
> >                 route 0.0.0.0/0 next-table inet.0;
> >             }       
> >         }           
> >     }               
> > }                   
> 
> I haven't played with this yet, but this looks fishy. What do you
> want to achieve with "next-table inet.0"?
> 
> Try replacing "next-table inet.0" with "next-hop 192.168.91.26" to
> send traffic down the private peering.

Does not make any difference.

The next-table inet.0 puts the following into the peerX.inet.0
table:

0.0.0.0/0          *[Static/5] 00:03:39
                      to table inet.0

Which, I believed might direct the traffic over to inet.0
for any routes that were not specifically in peerX.inet.0

bill