[j-nsp] MTU size of fxp0
Ethern M.C. Lin
ethern at ascc.net
Wed Apr 27 22:06:10 EDT 2005
Thank you all provide suggestion and comments for me,
I learn a lot from you.
Basically, I am evaluating the function between Juniper
and Cisco in the LAB, so what I can do is what I want
to try, so I don't care about the performance in the LAB.
<grin>
But I think all of you are right, the management port is
just for management port, don't ask too much.
Jonas:
I have modified the "net.pfe.transit_re", but it seems
nothing happen, what I can do next? I have executed
the command "ifconfig fxp0 mtu 1280", but still nothing
happened. Any suggestion?
Thank you all for your comments.
Best regards,
Ethern
--
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 02:11:17 -1000
Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:
>>> Actually this is an comparison trial between Juniper and Cisco.
>>> I have modified the Cisco's managemnet port MTU from 1500
>>> to 9216, and it could be a routed port. So I also want to try it
>>> on the Juniper. If I succeed, I would have more than one routed
>>> port. :)
>> There is no point in trying to modify the MTU of fxp0, since it
>> cannot be used for normal routing.
>
>and note that this is considered a feature. prevents crossover
>from the real network to the management network and vice versa.
>
>randy
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list