[j-nsp] Re: VLAN tagging

Fouant, Stefan A stefan.fouant at mci.com
Mon Jan 17 23:45:10 EST 2005


Hi,

Don't use VLAN ID 0.  Try using any other VLAN ID from 1-511.  Cheers,

Stefan Fouant
Senior Network Engineer
UUNET / MCI

> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Thomas Salmen
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:31 PM
> To: nuno.vieira at nfsi.pt; tozz at bind.com; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Re: VLAN tagging
> 
> 
> >
> > You should fix that with:
> >
> > set int fe-0/0/1 unit 0 vlan-id 0
> > set int fe-0/0/1 unit 100 vlan-id 100
> > set int fe-0/0/1 unit 200 vlan-id 200
> 
> Hmmm - I've actually tried this as well. It commits okay, but no traffic
> is
> passed on the 'vlan 0' interface.
> 
> Also, the docs tell me this:
> 
> "VLAN ID 0 is reserved for tagging the priority of frames."
> 
> Quite what this means isn't clear, I'm not really an expert on these
> things.
> I'm guessing that the end result is not going to be what I'm after,
> though.
> 
> 
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Nuno Vieira
> > NFSi - Soluções Internet, Lda.
> > Chief Technical Officer
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Thomas
> 
> >
> > Office Phone  : +351 244 145615
> > Mobile Phone  : +351 91 6184656
> > General Phone : +351 244 145600 (ext. 15)
> > Fax           : +351 244 145601
> >
> >
> > Craig Pierantozzi wrote:
> > > VLAN tagging is set on the physical and then
> > > you break it into logical units on the M series.
> > > You shouldn't be able to do this without a commit
> > > error:
> > >
> > > ---snip---
> > > router# show interfaces fe-0/0/1
> > > vlan-tagging;
> > > unit 0 {
> > >     family inet {
> > >         address 192.168.1.1/30;
> > >     }
> > > }
> > > unit 100 {
> > >     vlan-id 100;
> > >     family inet {
> > >         address 10.100.100.1/30;
> > >     }
> > > }
> > > unit 200 {
> > >     vlan-id 200;
> > >     family inet {
> > >         address 10.200.200.1/30;
> > >     }
> > > }
> > >
> > > [edit]
> > > router# commit check
> > > [edit interfaces fe-0/0/1]
> > >   'unit 0'
> > >      VLAN-ID must be specified on tagged ethernet interfaces
> > > error: configuration check-out failed
> > >
> > > ---snip---
> > >
> > > regards
> > > -Craig
> > >
> > > * Thus spake Thomas Salmen (tsalmen at orcon.net.nz):
> > >
> > >
> > >>Hello,
> > >>
> > >>On a Cisco router, it is possible to do this:
> > >>
> > >>interface FastEthernet4/0
> > >> ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
> > >>!
> > >>interface FastEthernet4/0.100
> > >>encapsulation dot1Q 100
> > >> ip address 10.100.100.1 255.255.255.252
> > >>!
> > >>interface FastEthernet4/0.200
> > >>encapsulation dot1Q 200
> > >>ip address 10.200.200.1 255.255.255.252
> > >>
> > >>That is, add VLAN-tagged logical subinterfaces to a non-tagged
> physical
> > >>interface.
> > >>
> > >>Does anyone know if this can be duplicated on an M-series?
> > >>
> > >>Cheers,
> > >>Thomas
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > >>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list