[j-nsp] Cisco 7600 vs. M10i performance tests

Mike Porter mike at udel.edu
Wed Jun 1 12:46:40 EDT 2005


On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Simon Leinen wrote:

> Mike Porter writes:
>> Raw performance may not be the only criteria.  For instance, we do
>> automatic configuration changes whenver a student's machine turns
>> into a spam-box.  We also automatically block port 3531 whenever a
>> student's machine turns into some kind of KaZaa drone (peer points
>> exchange?  Doesn't really matter).  Being able to make these kinds
>> of changes in an automatic fashion while being reasonably confident
>> that the router won't run out of "magic memory" is worth a lot.
>
> Not just that, but also good facilities for effecting such changes
> automatically.  Out of curiosity, what mechanism do you modify this
> access list in your router - JunoScript, CLI, other?

JunoScript.

Mike

>> I tooks hundreds of IPs out of the "port_3531_abusers" prefix-list
>> yesterday.
>
> The Supervisor 720 for the Cisco 7600, supports 32K access control
> entries in hardware.
> -- 
> Simon.
>
>

-
Mike Porter
PGP Fingerprint: F4 AE E1 9F 67 F7 DA EA  2F D2 37 F3 99 ED D1 C2


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list