[j-nsp] Interfaces, deactivate vs disable

[Johannes Resch]

On Wed, June 8, 2005 17:28, Eric Van Tol said:
>>Personally, I feel that deactivate can cause folks to feel the problem
>>relates to the config (or lack of), as it is easy to miss the
> deactivate
>>statement if you are below that hierarchy level.
>
> I agree.  It would be helpful if deactivated config statements could
> have hash-marks in front of them to make it more obvious.

also, it would be really helpful if "disable" used on a physical
interface also disabled the physical layer. (as opposed to deactivating
the whole PIC to disable L1 functionality - which is not really an option
on PICs with more than 1 port)

regards,
-jr