[j-nsp] Juniper box equivalent to GSR

[Kim Onnel]

Its already there.

But we'll buy the 2 new 7206 that will do thee translation

On 10/19/05, Rubens Kuhl Jr. <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > If i need to add multicast too, i'll use one PIC i guess,
>
> If you need Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM)
> tunnels, you can buy the M7i with integrated adaptive services
> PIC(which would give you other nice services as well). But using
> PIM-SM tunnels are just one multicast scenario, is this what are you
> doing or planning to ?
>
> > We initially need 1 GigE on the GSR, but i'm saying that it comes with 2
> > extra ones, to put OC12, i'll need to invest more in my old BPX cards,
> which
> > we dont plan to,
>
> > so overall, we feel M7i will be unscalable for future growth, we could
> have
> > done it with Lucent PSAX aggregators, but that too we didnt want to
> invest
> > in.
>
>
> The 3 GigE GSR card is the one I would stay away of, as I said on
> c-nsp... and I think the 4-port ISE card would not be as cheap. If
> your config requires 1 GigE and you have a limited budget, it's not an
> issue provided you have expansion capability.
>
> WIth an M7i with Adaptive Services and GigE integrated, you would
> talke 2 PICs for the ATM OC-3 connections. One future OC-12c POS PIC
> to service POS customers, one future GigE PIC to local connections,
> and it seems the M7i could have a nice life.
>
>
> > Attached are two diagrams of how the network looks like during migration
> > and after migration, note that the one node thats added to the GSR is
> > logical. its physically connetced to the BPX,
>
> Is the Internet PE an already existing router that will not be changed ?
>
>
> Rubens
>