[j-nsp] netscreen issue
Ben Dale
ben.dale at lanlink.com.au
Sun Jan 1 23:29:52 EST 2006
Hi Snort,
First of all, test to see which VR is going to be used to find the host
you are trying to ping:
ns50-> get int
A - Active, I - Inactive, U - Up, D - Down, R - Ready
Interfaces in vsys Root:
Name IP Address Zone MAC VLAN State
VSD
eth1 10.5.1.251/24 Trust 0010.db35.51b0 - U -
eth2 192.168.6.97/29 test 0010.db35.51b5 - U -
eth3 1.1.1.1/30 Untrust 0010.db35.51b6 - U -
eth4 0.0.0.0/0 Null 0010.db35.51b7 - D -
tun.1 unnumbered Untrust ethernet3 - R -
vlan1 0.0.0.0/0 VLAN 0010.db35.51bf 1 D -
null 0.0.0.0/0 Null 0000.5e00.0100 - U 0
ns50-> get route ip 192.168.6.98
Dest Routes for 192.168.6.98 in NULL
------------------------------------------------
trust-vr : => 0.0.0.0/0 (id=11) via 1.1.1.1 (vr: trust-vr)
Interface ethernet3 , metric 1
potential routes in other vrouters:
testbed-vr : => 192.168.6.97/29 (id=1) via 0.0.0.0 (vr: testbed-vr)
Interface ethernet2 , metric 0
ns50->
In this example, even though 192.168.6.98 is directly connected, a ping
off the box itself is still preferring the default route via trust-vr.
There is a command similar to what you're looking for though:
ping 192.168.6.98 from eth2
This will ping the host from the interface itself (which will ensure the
correct VR is used).
HTH,
Ben Dale
Network Engineer
Lanlink an integ Company
snort bsd wrote:
>Hi:
>
>I have a strange issue on my netscreen boxes. Besides
>two default virtual routers "untrust-vr" and
>"trust-vr", I created a third virtual router
>"testbed-vr" as out of band mannagment access,
>assigned a zone to it (binded an interface to that
>zone too) and it works in the sense that I can access
>the boxes remotely via ssh (I certainly can ping that
>interface from remote). Of vcourse I have a static
>route for that interface.
>
>now here is strange part: everything seems to be fine
>except I can't ping the next-hop gateway, or any IP
>addresses from the inside of those netscreen boxes.
>
>Obviously it is not the routing issue otherwise I
>would not be able to access the boxes from remote
>locations. The testbed-vr has onw routing table and
>netscreen has no commands similar like juniper-m
>series "ping logical-router r1 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx". More
>there is no relationship between testbed routing table
>and two other virtual routers' routing table,ie, the
>testbed is standing alone virtual router.
>
>this issue doesn't affect the operation, but I am
>perplexed by the behaviour.
>
>Any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
>Thanks
>
>PS: there are no policies configured except "set
>policy default-permit-all"
>
>
>Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list