[j-nsp] Re: ICMPv6 "packet too big" not being emitted
Hannes Gredler
hannes at juniper.net
Wed Jan 11 06:59:49 EST 2006
Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 07:46:24PM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> The problematic router's backbone uplinks are indeed unnumbered ATM
> PVCs, unlike the other routers I've tested which have POS/GigE uplinks.
> The "mtu exceeded" counter of "show pfe statistics ip6 icmp" is
> confirmed to NOT increase when receiving packets which are too large for
> the tunnel.
>
> Juniper: I'm pretty sure you have a serious problem with handling
> packets which would need fragmentation, being received on unnumbered
> links, in IPv4 and IPv6. Would you eventually care to open a PR about
> that this time, even if not submitted via sales channels or support
> contract? Should be in your best interest to get it fixed. :-)
daniel,
have opened PR67314
tx for the report,
/hannes
---
>Number: 67314
>Category: sw-kern-net
>Synopsis: generation of ICMP frag-needed but DF set broken if packet enters on unnumbered link
>Severity: minor
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: bug-sw-kern-net
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Target:
>Keywords: ICMP DF unnumbered
>Blocking-Release:
>Submitter-Id: jtac
>Arrival-Date: Wed Jan 11 03:56:15 -0800 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Hannes Gredler
>Release: 7.5-20060111.0
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list