[j-nsp] preferring shorter prefixes
Richard A Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Fri Jul 14 17:29:46 EDT 2006
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 04:13:14PM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I want to basically say "all prefixes from AS A override those from AS
> B". I cannot know ahead of time which prefixes they are or what the
> lengths are. I would filter the longer/more specifics if I could
> identify that there was a shorter/less specific prefix in the routing
> table (there is no default route in the routing table in this case).
The only thing that trumps a more specific prefix is a different rib.
We've probably all faced that same exact problem from a policy perspective
at one point or another, and a diff rib is unfortunately the best answer.
It's not theoretically impossible to do what you want (you could just have
the software check for more/less specifics when doing best path seection
before installing into the rib), but don't expect to ever see a vendor
implement or support it. Also be careful not to exceed your dram/sram
capacity when making extra tables, and if you need to do it a lot or on a
large number of routes you are probably SOL.
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
More information about the juniper-nsp