[j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest,uniper & Cisco interoperability

Seyda Tahincioglu seyda.tahincioglu at is.net.tr
Tue Nov 21 01:54:31 EST 2006 

	If you have ciso and juniper configuration for RSVP tunnel it
will be enough for me, in my old e-mails I have forggotten to write what
i need exactly ... Sorry for that...

Regards,


Seyda



-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of deepak Raj
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 4:55 AM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest,uniper & Cisco interoperability
(Seyda Tahincioglu)

Your question is very generic.

i have cisoc and juniper config for RSVP tunnel.let me know if helps
you.

On 11/20/06, juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net <
juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to
>         juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         juniper-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Port Mirroing (Transworld Associates)
>    2. Juniper Hidden Routes (FAHAD ALI KHAN)
>    3. Re: Juniper Hidden Routes (John Kristoff)
>    4. Re: Port Mirroing (Peder Christian Bach)
>    5. Re: Juniper Hidden Routes ( Rafa? Szarecki )
>    6. Re: Juniper Hidden Routes (FAHAD ALI KHAN)
>    7. Juniper & Cisco interoperability (Seyda Tahincioglu)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:00:00 +0500
> From: "Transworld Associates" <juniper.m320 at gmail.com>
> Subject: [j-nsp] Port Mirroing
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
>         <9740bacc0611192200q6e9e1d73ya755c830120c9921 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Dear All !
>
> I need to configure Port Mirroring on my M320, Kindly help me out and
any
> one can show me the basic steps and sample configuration,
> Would be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks !
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:35:31 +0500
> From: "FAHAD ALI KHAN" <fahad.alikhan at gmail.com>
> Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper Hidden Routes
> To: juniper-nsp <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
>         <9347ea5b0611200035l311bed0ckc314a1c1317383cb at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Guys
>
> Need to ask question about Hidden routes in Juniper Platform,
>
> Hidden routes are the ones which are un-installed in routing table due
to
> Import Routing policy or some other issues like, they may have an
> unresolvable next hop, or there may be a forwarding-table export
filter
> that
> keeps them from being used.
>
> They are of no use...if i reject them via import policy, but they will
> remain in my system....and surely occupy memory space....
>
> Is there any way to simply reject them and not put them locally on my
> router? So that i can save my router Memory.
>
> Regards
>
> Fahad
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 04:34:30 -0600
> From: John Kristoff <jtk at ultradns.net>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Hidden Routes
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID: <200611201034.kAKAYVbW008712 at atlas.centergate.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Mon, 20 Nov 2006 13:35:31 +0500
> "FAHAD ALI KHAN" <fahad.alikhan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hidden routes are the ones which are un-installed in routing table
> > due to Import Routing policy or some other issues like, they may
have
> > an unresolvable next hop, or there may be a forwarding-table export
> > filter that keeps them from being used.
>
> Or simply that they have not been selected due to the best path
> algorithm.
>
> > They are of no use...if i reject them via import policy, but they
will
> > remain in my system....and surely occupy memory space....
>
> They may be very useful to examine during troubleshooting scenarios.
>
> > Is there any way to simply reject them and not put them locally on
my
> > router? So that i can save my router Memory.
>
> 'keep none' in the appropriate 'protocols bgp' sub-section.  I came
> across this concern once before, although I don't know that I ever saw
> a problem with hidden routes using up too much memory, it might be
nice
> if there was some sort of knob to limit the size of hidden routes.  I
> would be interested in hearing any thoughts from others about that.
>
> John
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:24:14 +0100
> From: "Peder Christian Bach" <peder at ipnett.no>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Port Mirroing
> To: "Transworld Associates" <juniper.m320 at gmail.com>,
>         <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID: <AA3DFD8269297F42A9D0967E55B7613106B4FD at pompel.ipnett.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> www.google..com  is your friend !
>
>
>
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos71/swconfig71-policy
/html/sampling-config21.html
>
>
>
>
> -Peder
>
> -----Opprinnelig melding-----
> Fra: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] P? vegne av Transworld Associates
> Sendt: 20. november 2006 07:00
> Til: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Emne: [j-nsp] Port Mirroing
>
> Dear All !
>
> I need to configure Port Mirroring on my M320, Kindly help me out and
any
> one can show me the basic steps and sample configuration,
> Would be highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks !
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 11:56:01 +0100
> From: " Rafa? Szarecki " <rszarecki at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Hidden Routes
> To: "John Kristoff" <jtk at ultradns.net>
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
>         <2bc678370611200256i1097b6c9u87d817bd2b215d91 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
>
> >
> > > Hidden routes are the ones which are un-installed in routing table
> > > due to Import Routing policy or some other issues like, they may
have
> > > an unresolvable next hop, or there may be a forwarding-table
export
> > > filter that keeps them from being used.
> >
> > Or simply that they have not been selected due to the best path
> > algorithm.
>
>
> No, If route is just not best but is eligable to be a best, then this
> route
> is _not_ hidden.
> Hidden routers are this which do not pass sanity check ore was
rejected by
> import policy.
>
>
>
> --
> Rafa? Szarecki JNCIE
> +48602418971
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:14:50 +0500
> From: "FAHAD ALI KHAN" <fahad.alikhan at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper Hidden Routes
> To: " Rafa? Szarecki " <rszarecki at gmail.com>
> Cc: John Kristoff <jtk at ultradns.net>, juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Message-ID:
>         <9347ea5b0611200314r6f05310esf8e65d3c9682cddb at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
>
> John..... BGP "keep none" work for me.....now there is no more hidden
> routes...
>
> but im agree with John it is very help full in troubleshooting...
>
> There have to be some procedure like in policy to set *keep all* for
> specific route-filters and *keep none* for remaining...
>
> Need to hear from other techies also......!
>
>
> On 11/20/06, Rafa? Szarecki <rszarecki at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > > Hidden routes are the ones which are un-installed in routing
table
> > > > due to Import Routing policy or some other issues like, they may
> have
> > > > an unresolvable next hop, or there may be a forwarding-table
export
> > > > filter that keeps them from being used.
> > >
> > > Or simply that they have not been selected due to the best path
> > > algorithm.
> >
> >
> > No, If route is just not best but is eligable to be a best, then
this
> > route
> > is _not_ hidden.
> > Hidden routers are this which do not pass sanity check ore was
rejected
> by
> > import policy.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rafa? Szarecki JNCIE
> > +48602418971
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:42:16 +0200
> From: "Seyda Tahincioglu" <seyda.tahincioglu at is.net.tr>
> Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper & Cisco interoperability
> To: <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Message-ID:
>         <1BB1AD44E169AC48A5A725C65D31B567AD16B3 at msg.domain.is.net.tr>
> Content-Type: text/plain;       charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Is there any one who has some templates and how to do tunnelling
between
> cisco and Juniper routers...( step by step :) )
>
> How can i provide Juniper and Cisco work together in Mpls?
>
>
> Seyda
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list
> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 48, Issue 18
> *******************************************
>
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list