[j-nsp] Alternatives to floating static routes?
Dario
dario.donsion at soporte.rediris.es
Tue Oct 3 07:57:04 EDT 2006
Dear all,
The customer routers are Cisco 7200 and Cisco 7600, I don't know if they support
BFD but I don't think so :(
So we need other solutions, BGP or another one.
Regards,
Dario D.
El Martes, 3 de Octubre de 2006 13:50, George Yalamov escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> What are Customer 1 and 2 routers? If they are Juniper will be great,
> and your can use BFD and static route.
>
> As I know cisco series higher than 76xx support BFD but not with static
> route.
>
>
> Regards
> George
>
>
> Dario wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We need to develop a solution to provide redundancy for two of our clientes, connected to us via our
> > Cisco Catalyst 2950.
> >
> > This is the topology:
> > [FastEth]
> > Router Customer 1 ------------- | [GigaEth]
> > | Cat 2950 --------------- Juniper M40e
> > Router Customer 2 ------------- |
> > [FastEth]
> >
> > Right now we have static routes in our Juniper to connect with each customer. The customers have the
> > posibility to connect their routers. Each one request us to reroute its networks via the other customer when
> > its link fails.
> >
> > We first think in floating static routes, two routes for each customer, the actual one and other via the
> > other customer with more metric.
> >
> > But it'll no work because if for example the link between the Customer 1 and our CAT 2950 fails, our
> > Juniper see the link with the CAT 2950 up (no possibility to configure keepalives), then the active route
> > is the static route without metric, it never changes to the floating route.
> >
> > BGP (using prepends,...) is a solution but we prefer another one if possible. Any ideas?
> >
> > Many thanks and best regards,
> >
> > Dario D.
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list