[j-nsp] GRE Between Juniper and Cisco
Pekka Savola
pekkas at netcore.fi
Thu Oct 19 10:26:11 EDT 2006
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Ranjit Bahad wrote:
> They are connected over a 100Mbps WAN link.
You have a tunnel PIC, right?
If you look closely, you see that both ends have both sent and
received packets.
Does the 100 Mbit/s WAN link have high enough MTU to accommodate up to
1514+encapsulation (about 1546) bytes?
You should also check filters at your Juniper physical outgoing
interface. Tunnels have a weird implementation which require that you
accept packets with _your_ tunnel endpoint's address at the input of
the physical interface.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erdem Sener [mailto:erdems at gmail.com]
> Sent: 19 October 2006 14:54
> To: Ranjit Bahad
> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] GRE Between Juniper and Cisco
>
> Hi,
>
> How are these boxes are connected to each other?
>
> In first guess, it seems the problem is in some kind of switch between
> them.
>
> HTH
>
> On 10/19/06, Ranjit Bahad <Ranjit_Bahad at inmarsat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> I have a link services pic installed in a M10 and have configured a
> GRE
>> tunnel from this box to a Cisco router.
>>
>>
>>
>> Below are the configs:
>>
>>
>>
>> Juniper:
>>
>>
>>
>> gr-1/0/0 {
>>
>> unit 10 {
>>
>> tunnel {
>>
>> source 172.30.9.2;
>>
>> destination 172.30.12.2;
>>
>> }
>>
>> family inet {
>>
>> mtu 1514;
>>
>> address 1.1.1.1/24;
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> show interfaces gr-1/0/0
>>
>> Physical interface: gr-1/0/0, Enabled, Physical link is Up
>>
>> Interface index: 147, SNMP ifIndex: 69
>>
>> Type: GRE, Link-level type: GRE, MTU: Unlimited, Speed: 800mbps
>>
>> Device flags : Present Running
>>
>> Interface flags: Point-To-Point SNMP-Traps
>>
>> Input rate : 0 bps (0 pps)
>>
>> Output rate : 0 bps (0 pps)
>>
>>
>>
>> Logical interface gr-1/0/0.10 (Index 105) (SNMP ifIndex 86)
>>
>> Flags: Point-To-Point SNMP-Traps 16384
>>
>> IP-Header 172.30.12.2:172.30.9.2:47:df:64:0000000000000000
>> Encapsulation: GRE-NULL
>>
>> Input packets : 26
>>
>> Output packets: 29
>>
>> Protocol inet, MTU: 1514
>>
>> Flags: User-MTU
>>
>> Addresses, Flags: Is-Preferred Is-Primary
>>
>> Destination: 1.1.1/24, Local: 1.1.1.1, Broadcast: 1.1.1.255
>>
>>
>>
>> Cisco:
>>
>>
>>
>> sh int tunnel 10
>>
>> Tunnel10 is up, line protocol is up
>>
>> Hardware is Tunnel
>>
>> Internet address is 1.1.1.2/24
>>
>> MTU 1514 bytes, BW 9 Kbit, DLY 500000 usec,
>>
>> reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
>>
>> Encapsulation TUNNEL, loopback not set
>>
>> Keepalive not set
>>
>> Tunnel source 172.30.12.2, destination 172.30.9.2, fastswitch TTL 255
>>
>> Tunnel protocol/transport GRE/IP, key disabled, sequencing disabled
>>
>> Tunnel TTL 255
>>
>> Checksumming of packets disabled, fast tunneling enabled
>>
>> Last input 00:09:41, output 00:05:06, output hang never
>>
>> Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
>>
>> Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
>>
>> Queueing strategy: fifo
>>
>> Output queue: 0/0 (size/max)
>>
>> 5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>>
>> 5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
>>
>> L2 Switched: ucast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes - mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes
>>
>> L3 in Switched: ucast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes - mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes mcast
>>
>> L3 out Switched: ucast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes
>>
>> 3 packets input, 888 bytes, 0 no buffer
>>
>> Received 0 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
>>
>> 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
>>
>> 0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
>>
>> 36 packets output, 4012 bytes, 0 underruns
>>
>> 0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
>>
>> 0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
>>
>> AMCORRTR02#
>>
>> AMCORRTR02#
>>
>> AMCORRTR02#sh run int tun
>>
>> AMCORRTR02#sh run int tunnel 10
>>
>> Building configuration...
>>
>>
>>
>> Current configuration : 118 bytes
>>
>> !
>>
>> interface Tunnel10
>>
>> ip address 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.0
>>
>> tunnel source 172.30.12.2
>>
>> tunnel destination 172.30.9.2
>>
>> end
>>
>>
>>
>> Neither end of the tunnel can ping each other. Pinging the physical
> IP's
>> of each host router is ok. Any help will be greatly appreciated!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> Raj.
>>
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Verizon Business Internet
> Managed Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further
> information visit http://www.mci.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
>
>
>
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list