[j-nsp] Strange Packet Loss Problem
Christian Koch
ckoch at globix.com
Mon Oct 23 08:46:36 EDT 2006
Josef,
I can do the rapids, but we cant take down this OC48 link to put a loop.
-----Original Message-----
From: Josef Buchsteiner [mailto:josefb at juniper.net]
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 8:45 AM
To: Christian Koch
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Strange Packet Loss Problem
I see... lets then go back to the rapid pings and see where
the icmp bad checksum counter is increasing and do then local
loop actions...
thanks
Josef
Monday, October 23, 2006, 2:38:21 PM, you wrote:
CK>
CK>
CK> Hey Josef,
CK>
CK> Real quick, here is a regular ping which looks fine, and a
CK> snapshot of system icmp stats
CK>
CK> ckoch at core2.lhr3> ping 212.71.229.25 PING 212.71.229.25
CK> (212.71.229.25): 56 data bytes
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=0 ttl=251 time=1.113 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=1 ttl=251 time=1.063 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=2 ttl=251 time=0.957 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=3 ttl=251 time=0.995 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=4 ttl=251 time=0.947 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=5 ttl=251 time=1.429 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=6 ttl=251 time=0.934 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=7 ttl=251 time=1.017 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=8 ttl=251 time=0.935 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=9 ttl=251 time=0.973 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=10 ttl=251 time=1.138 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=11 ttl=251 time=1.003 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=12 ttl=251 time=0.946 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=13 ttl=251 time=1.172 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=14 ttl=251 time=1.002 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=15 ttl=251 time=1.009 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=16 ttl=251 time=0.921 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=17 ttl=251 time=1.009 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=18 ttl=251 time=0.959 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=19 ttl=251 time=0.973 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=20 ttl=251 time=2.362 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=21 ttl=251 time=1.034 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=22 ttl=251 time=1.007 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=23 ttl=251 time=0.913 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=24 ttl=251 time=0.959 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=25 ttl=251 time=1.021 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=26 ttl=251 time=0.996 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=27 ttl=251 time=0.966 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=28 ttl=251 time=3.044 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=29 ttl=251 time=0.940 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=30 ttl=251 time=0.946 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=31 ttl=251 time=1.054 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=32 ttl=251 time=0.989 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=33 ttl=251 time=0.973 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=34 ttl=251 time=0.963 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=35 ttl=251 time=1.028 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=36 ttl=251 time=0.954 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=37 ttl=251 time=0.965 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=38 ttl=251 time=0.999 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=39 ttl=251 time=1.003 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=40 ttl=251 time=0.897 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=41 ttl=251 time=1.126 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=42 ttl=251 time=0.913 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=43 ttl=251 time=1.058 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=44 ttl=251 time=0.942 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=45 ttl=251 time=1.030 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=46 ttl=251 time=0.941 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=47 ttl=251 time=1.047 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=48 ttl=251 time=0.938 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=49 ttl=251 time=0.954 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=50 ttl=251 time=0.964 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=51 ttl=251 time=0.976 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=52 ttl=251 time=0.944 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=53 ttl=251 time=1.006 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=54 ttl=251 time=0.972 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=55 ttl=251 time=1.585 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=56 ttl=251 time=0.990 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=57 ttl=251 time=11.160 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=58 ttl=251 time=0.948 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=59 ttl=251 time=21.018 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=60 ttl=251 time=0.996 ms
CK> 64 bytes from 212.71.229.25: icmp_seq=61 ttl=251 time=30.768 ms ^C
CK> --- 212.71.229.25 ping statistics ---
CK> 62 packets transmitted, 62 packets received, 0% packet loss
CK> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.897/2.029/30.768/4.634 ms
CK>
CK> ckoch at core2.lhr3> show system statistics icmp
CK> icmp:
CK> 0 drops due to rate limit
CK> 3747728 calls to icmp_error
CK> 0 errors not generated because old message was icmp
CK> Output histogram:
CK> echo reply: 9220380
CK> destination unreachable: 3745300
CK> time exceeded: 1577
CK> time stamp reply: 472
CK> 2 messages with bad code fields
CK> 0 messages less than the minimum length
CK> 338 messages with bad checksum
CK> 2 messages with bad source address
CK> 28 messages with bad length
CK> 15 echo drops with broadcast or multicast destinaton
CK> address
CK> 0 timestamp drops with broadcast or multicast destination
CK> address
CK> Input histogram:
CK> echo reply: 50251
CK> destination unreachable: 5631
CK> source quench: 6
CK> routing redirect: 829
CK> #7: 2
CK> echo: 9220395
CK> time exceeded: 1883
CK> parameter problem: 1
CK> time stamp: 472
CK> time stamp reply: 1
CK> information request reply: 20
CK> address mask reply: 2
CK> 9220852 message responses generated
CK>
CK> -----Original Message-----
CK> From: Josef Buchsteiner [mailto:josefb at juniper.net]
CK> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 9:27 AM
CK> To: Christian Koch
CK> Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
CK> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Strange Packet Loss Problem
CK>
CK> Christian,
CK>
CK> if it is a data corruption on certain bit patterns then
CK> you should see this problem also without rapid pings.
CK> In order to find out where this happen I would
CK> certainly perform a regular ping ( you may need more
CK> packets ) and watch the icmp statistics to confirm that
CK> it is data corruption in case you get icmp chksum
CK> errors. "show system statistics icmp"
CK>
CK> To find out if this is local or remote ( you could make
CK> some statements with the icmp statistics already
CK> however I prefer solid results)and you need to put this
CK> sonet link into local loop and encapsulation cisco-hdlc
CK> with no-keepalive. Then you perform the ping again with
CK> bypass routing and interface knob to make sure the
CK> traffic goes out and comes back in and you watch the
CK> packet result and icmp statistics. This way you will
CK> find out if this is local M40 or remote M40.
CK>
CK> Once you know this it becomes kinda bit tricky. It
CK> could be the FPC in question that is the trigger but
CK> also other FPCs are contributing in the shared data
CK> buffer which means you would need to turn off one by
CK> one and see if the error stops. If you are left with
CK> the OC-48 then I would suggest to replace this
CK> particular FPC. To sanity check also other links of the
CK> router if possible.
CK>
CK> Check also the message log if you ever have seen
CK> anytime ECC error reported. Just one of them is already
CK> enough to give you some hints as you would not need to
CK> do above isolation work
CK>
CK> hope this helps
CK> Josef
CK>
CK> PS: yes I do have seen such symptoms in the past
CK> and not only on one vendor.
CK>
CK>
CK>
CK> Friday, October 20, 2006, 8:36:09 PM, you wrote:
CK>
CK>>
CK>>
CK>> Hi All,
CK>>
CK>> I am experiencing a strange issue between 2 m40 core routers CK>> connect through an oc48 link CK>> CK>> I experience packet loss only when sending packets between 293 and CK>> 599 bytes.
CK>>
CK>> I am also speaking to cold telecom about the issue to see if it's a
CK>
CK>> problem with the sonet link, but as of now the link is not taking CK>> any errors or alarms.
CK>>
CK>> Anyone seen anything strange like this before?
CK>>
CK>> ckoch at core2.lhr3> ping rapid 212.71.229.25 count 10000 size 300 CK>> PING 212.71.229.25 (212.71.229.25): 300 data bytes CK>> CK>>
CK>
CK> !.!!.!!.!!!!.!.!....!!.!!!!!..!..!!.!!!..!!.!!....!!.!...!!!...!.!.!..!.
CK>> .!!...!....!..!.!.!!.!!.!!....!.!!!!!!..!..!.!!.!..!!.!!^C
CK>> --- 212.71.229.25 ping statistics --- CK>> 129 packets transmitted, 66 packets received, 48% packet loss CK>> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.023/1.640/34.095/4.035 ms CK>> CK>> ckoch at core2.lhr3> ping rapid 212.71.229.25 count 10000 size 400 CK>> PING 212.71.229.25 (212.71.229.25): 400 data bytes CK>> !!!!!!!!.!!!!!...!!^C CK>> --- 212.71.229.25 ping statistics --- 20 packets transmitted, 15 CK>> packets received, 25% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = CK>> 1.074/1.111/1.348/0.071 ms CK>> CK>> ckoch at core2.lhr3> ping rapid 212.71.229.25 count 10000 size 500 CK>> PING 212.71.229.25 (212.71.229.25): 500 data bytes CK>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.!^C
CK>> --- 212.71.229.25 ping statistics --- CK>> 49 packets transmitted, 46 packets received, 6% packet loss CK>> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.141/1.202/2.514/0.210 ms CK>> CK>> ckoch at core2.lhr3> ping rapid 212.71.229.25 count 10000 size 600 CK>> PING 212.71.229.25 (212.71.229.25): 600 data bytes CK>> CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!^C
CK>> --- 212.71.229.25 ping statistics --- CK>> 955 packets transmitted, 954 packets received, 0% packet loss CK>> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.183/1.526/36.436/1.817 ms CK>> CK>> koch at core2.lhr3> ping rapid 212.71.229.25 count 10000 size 292 CK>> PING 212.71.229.25 (212.71.229.25): 292 data bytes CK>> CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CK>> !!!!!!!!^C!
CK>> --- 212.71.229.25 ping statistics --- CK>> 916 packets transmitted, 916 packets received, 0% packet loss CK>> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.988/1.146/9.918/1.061 ms CK>> CK>> ckoch at core2.lhr3> ping rapid 212.71.229.25 count 10000 size 293 CK>> PING 212.71.229.25 (212.71.229.25): 293 data bytes ..!!!.!^C CK>> CK>> Christian CK>> _______________________________________________
CK>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net CK>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
CK>>
CK>>
CK>>
CK>
CK>
CK>
CK>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list