[j-nsp] Adaptive services(1)
Richard A Steenbergen
ras at e-gerbil.net
Mon Sep 25 17:11:53 EDT 2006
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:36:40PM +0200, Jonas Frey wrote:
> Speaking of E-FPC's, anyone got a link to a list regarding differences
> between E-FPC and FPC? I once a page with details but it seems i lost
> the link.
> I know there are differences on QoS queues and memory, but i dont recall
> the details.
Besides the obvious published difference of more QoS queues supported, the
other differences I've run across are:
* You need FPC-E to support certain types of PICs period. For example I
have a 1GE-SFP-QPP which will only run on an FPC-E (well, it will run
on an FPC, but it can't RECEIVE .1q tagged trafic properly, tx and
untagged seems to work, and the offical documentation position is that
it requires FPC-E).
* As the code and features have grown over the years, the microcode space
on the original FPC has run low. The FPC-E's have more space to let you
run "all combinations" of PICs (ATM, SONET, Ethernet, AS etc) on a
single FPC.
* The change between B-Chip 2.0 and 3.0 increased the amount of packet
header that can be rewritten. For example on FPC non-E if you run an
MPLS l2circuit OVER a .1q tagged circuit and leave control-word on, you
will exceed the L2RW capacity and the router will crash and burn (on
M160 it corrupts the FIB royally :P).
And probably a great many more. If there isn't a comprehensive list of
changes published on Juniper's website (and somehow I doubt they will ever
publish the feature differences in the B-Chip versions etc), I'd really
like to get this onto a juniper.cluepon.net page. Perhaps other people can
add to this list, or someone from Juniper can describe the changes in more
detail.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list