[j-nsp] BGP Origin Issue
Borchers, Mark M.
Mark.Borchers at McLeodUSA.com
Thu Apr 19 16:40:12 EDT 2007
Thanks to all responders. To summarize request for further info:
1. We do *not* have any origin attributes contained in any inbound or
outbound policy statements. We are filtering inbound from downstreams only
by prefix. Outbound policy is a mix of as-path and prefix terms. In this
case, first match would be on an as-path term.
2. We are receiving all advertisements from the downstream site, both
origin-incomplete and origin-internal.
3. All routes are being advertised and received in IBGP ok.
4. After doing "show routes adv bgp" it does appear that we are announcing
all prefixes including origin-incomplete. It's possible they are being
rejected by our peers, although I'm pretty confident that most should be
accepting them.
Based on the fact that nobody has said "Yo dummy, JunOS never re-advertises
prefixes with origin incomplete", I'm going to do more detailed checking on
the looking glasses.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Angel Bardarov [mailto:angel.bardarov at btc-net.bg]
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 3:20 PM
> To: Borchers, Mark M.
> Cc: 'juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net'
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP Origin Issue
>
>
>
>
> Borchers, Mark M. wrote:
> > Thus, those nine appeared to us on an M20 as origin
> > incomplete. None were advertised to other peers.
> >
> In that case the problematic routes are present in the
> routing table of
> your M20. Do you have export policies to you iBGP peers? Can you post
> the output from "show route advertising-protocol bgp ..."
>
> Angel
>
NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential
information and is intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, copying
or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender via e-mail.
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list