[j-nsp] Issues setting up LACP between M40 and Cisco 6500 CATOS

WeiWei iamwwei at msn.com
Sun Jun 24 06:24:00 EDT 2007


Hi Jerome,
    Do you mean it is on the same PIC or FPC?
 
Best,
 
Wei Wei



> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:25:25 +0200> From: jeje at jeje.org> To: dbenson at swingpad.com> CC: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Issues setting up LACP between M40 and Cisco 6500 CATOS> > To add a little of my experience (lots of such configs in my network), > I've always ran into trouble when playing with 802.3ad with interfaces > that are on different FPC (facing a Cisco 6506).> On the contrary, I have only good experience when the 802.3ad trunk is > on the same PIC.> > Maybe that helps.> > Jerome.> > Dan Benson a écrit :> > Thank you all for the help here. I have one last question on this > > matter. Is there more config that needs to be done on the juniper side > > to load balance across these links? I see in the cisco I can configure > > it to balance based on MAC sorce/destination. I have read that the > > juniper does this based on IP destination. Does it do so by default? > > The documentation I have seen is very gray in this area. Thanks.. //db> >> > Phil Bedard wrote:> > > >> You don't need to run a dynamic protocol (PaGP/LACP) to use an > >> etherchannel/aggregate interface, just set> >> mode to "on" on the Cisco end, and do not run LACP on the Juniper end.> >>> >> Phil> >>> >>> >> On May 3, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Dan Benson wrote:> >>> >> > >>> Nicolaj, that would explain my issue. Thank you. I am open to> >>> suggestions on some form of etherchannel between the cisco and the> >>> juniper, it was my understanding that the juniper and cisco only support> >>> LACP as being the common protocol. Was I wrong in this estimation?> >>> Thanks.. //db> >>>> >>> Nicolaj Kamensek wrote:> >>> > >>>> Dan Benson wrote:> >>>>> >>>> Hi Dan,> >>>>> >>>> > >>>>> interfaces ae0 vlan-tagging;> >>>>> aggregated-ether-options {> >>>>> link-speed 1g;> >>>>> lacp {> >>>>> active;> >>>>> }> >>>>> > >>>> do you have FPC or FPC-E? Active LACP is only possible with the> >>>> enhanced FPC. However, why do you want lacp?> >>>>> >>>> Regards,> >>>> Nico> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> > >>> _______________________________________________> >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp> >>> > >> Phil Bedard> >> philxor at gmail.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> --No virus found in this incoming message.> >> Checked by AVG Free Edition.Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: > >> 269.6.2/785 - Release Date: 5/2/2007 2:16 PM> >>> >>> >> > >> > _______________________________________________> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp> > > > _______________________________________________> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_________________________________________________________________
通过 Windows Live Spaces 与朋友轻松共享您的生活。
http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=zh-cn


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list