[j-nsp] vrf routing for aggregate sonet

[Ariff Premji]

Beny,
I'de have to check but I dont believe vrf-table-label is currently  
supported on PE-P or PE-PE interfaces where the you use agg-sonet.   
If you need to make this work with agg-sonet, you will need a tunnel- 
pic (or vt interface) as described at this link:

http://tinyurl.com/yrjbt5

To work around this, you may consider using multiple LSPs between the  
PEs.  The LSPs will load-balance the traffic based on the hash  
algorithm.  There are a few knobs available that can influence what  
attributes are considered for the hash calculation.  This coupled  
with auto-bandwidth may give you a nice spread.

Hope this helps.

-Ariff

On May 20, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Beny Dwi Setyawan wrote:

> Dear All,
>
>
>
> I'm having problem when using aggregate sonet for MPLS backbone,  
> the vrf
> routing table established on PE01 from PE02, but I can't reach the
> routing
> from PE01.
>
> I used vrf-table-label since I don't have LS-PIC on the PE02 for vt
> interfaces. Does anyone of you ever experience this problem before?
> Bellow is the network :
>
>
>
> PE01 <-- STM-1 -->  P-Core-1 <-- aggregate sonet (4 x STM-1) -->
> P-Core-2
> <-- aggregate sonet (2 x STM-1) --> PE02
>
> Please need your suggestion since I don't have available PIC on  
> PE02 if
> the
> solution is to add LS-PIC on it for vt interfaces.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Beny D Setyawan
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp