[j-nsp] J2300 T1 Load balancing
Phil Bedard
philxor at gmail.com
Wed Apr 2 16:06:54 EDT 2008
I don't know that much about the J2300 packet engines, but on the IP2
in the other platforms, the "load-balance per-packet" is a bit of a
misnomer. With that configured, it will still forward packets to an
egress interface based on L3/L4 hashing, as opposed to actually doing
per-packet load balancing. The configuration looks fine to me, so
that's probably the case with the J2300 as well.
Phil
On Apr 2, 2008, at 3:10 PM, Peder @ NetworkOblivion wrote:
> I have a J2300 running 8.3R1.5 and I am trying to do packet by packet
> load balancing over two T1's. I tried the config below that I thought
> would work and it doesn't seem to load balance. If I do a big upload,
> one T1 gets flooded and the other is virtually empty. Any ideas
> what I
> did wrong? The next-hop IPs are correct. I do see traffic on both
> links, just not anywhere near load balanced outbound. Note that I
> cannot do MLPPP or MLFR, so don't suggest it, and I am not trying to
> load balance inbound. I am trying to balance outbound from my J2300.
> Thanks.
>
> routing-options {
> static {
> route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop [ 192.168.1.1 192.168.2.1 ];
> }
> forwarding-table {
> export load-balance-default;
> }
> }
> policy-options {
> policy-statement load-balance-default {
> term default-route {
> from {
> route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 exact;
> }
> then {
> load-balance per-packet;
> }
> }
> }
> }
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list