[j-nsp] LDP issue between M10i and ERX

[Junaid]

A little help required people .... :(

Regards,
Junaid


On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Junaid <junaid.x86 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  I am trying to enable MPLS between ERX1440 and M10i routers. The
>  routers are connected via an Ethernet switch. I have three Cisco
>  routers on the same subnet as well. Strangely, all routers are able to
>  form LDP sessions with each other but M10i and ERX are not
>  establishing LDP session. Although both junipers are able to establish
>  LDP with three ciscos but they are not able to form LDP with each
>  other. I received the following debug logs on junipers:
>
>  Legend:
>  -----------
>  AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD : Loopback IP address of ERX
>  WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ : Loopback IP address of M10i
>
>
>  On M10i:
>
>   Connection AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD state Opening -> Open
>   Session AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD state Connecting -> Initialized
>   Session AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD state Initialized -> OpenSent
>   LDP sent TCP PDU WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ -> AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD (none)
>   ver 1, pkt len 52, PDU len 48, ID WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ:0
>    Msg Initialization (0x200), len 38, ID 182964
>      TLV SesParms (0x500), len 14
>        Ver 1, holdtime 30, flags <> (0x0)
>        vect_lim 0, max_pdu 4096, id AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD:0
>      TLV GracefulRestartParms (0x8503), len 12
>        Reconnect time 0 ms, recovery time 0 ms.
>   Unexpected EOF from AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD
>
>
>  ON ERX:
>
>  ldpMessages (default): ldp_demux.c:677: LDPDemuxProcessSesMsg: WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ
>  ldpMessages (default):   Msg Initialization (0x200), len 38, ID 182949
>  ldpMessages (default):     TLV SesParms (0x500), len 14
>  ldpMessages (default):       Ver 1, holdtime 30, flags <Downstream
>  Unsolicited, Loop Detection disabled> (0x0)
>  ldpMessages (default):       vect_lim 0, max_pdu 4096, id AAA.BBB.CCC.DDD:0
>  ldpMessages (default):     TLV GracefulRestartParms (0x8503), len 12
>  ldpMessages (default):       FT Flags <Learn From Network Flag set>, (0x1)
>  ldpMessages (default):       Reconnect time 0 ms, recovery time 0 ms.
>  ldpMessages (default): LDPDemuxProcessSesMsg: Recv init message for
>  passive session
>  ldpGeneral (default): ldp_demux.c:820: LDPDemuxProcessSesMsg: Peer
>  Does not exists for WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ
>  ldpGeneral (default): ldp_tcp_read.c:640: LDPProcessCommSap: The sap
>  handle has been put in the error list
>  ldpPeer (default): TCPClose: hHandle 0x8d3ed654 socket 0x8d3ed2e4 to
>  WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ:1291
>  ldpPeer (default): rsFiconCrldpNetworkServices.cc:606: FiconTcpSocket
>  acceptNotify: 0x8d3ed674 sapHandle 0x8d3ed7b4, acceptCount = 1
>  ldpPeer (default): rsFiconCrldpNetworkServices.cc:3548:
>  doSocketNotify: sap 0x8d3ed7b4 acceptCount 1
>  ldpPeer (default): rsFiconCrldpNetworkServices.cc:3570:
>  doSocketNotify: sap 0x8d3ed7b4 FiconTcpSocket 0x8d3ed674
>  ldpPeer (default): rsFiconCrldpNetworkServices.cc:2486: TCPAccept:
>  hHandle 0x8d3ed654 socket 0x8d3ed2e4 local port 646 remote
>  WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ:4762
>  ldpMessages (default): [LDPDemuxProcessAccept]: Accepted TCP
>  connection from WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ:4762 on socket 0x8d3ed654
>  ldpPeer (default): rsFiconCrldpNetworkServices.cc:725: FiconTcpSocket
>  receiveNotify: 0x8d3ed2e4 sapHandle 0x8d3ed654
>  ldpPeer (default): rsFiconCrldpNetworkServices.cc:3548:
>  doSocketNotify: sap 0x8d3ed654 receive event acceptCount 0
>  ldpPeer (default): rsFiconCrldpNetworkServices.cc:3570:
>  doSocketNotify: sap 0x8d3ed654 FiconTcpSocket 0x8d3ed2e4
>  ldpGeneral (default): ldp_tcp_read.c:284: LDPProcessCommSap: Message
>  received over non Session Socket, map to session
>
>
>  I have used the following config templates for junipers:
>
>
>  For Juniper (JunOS):
>
>  # set interfaces ge-0/1/0 unit 2 family mpls
>  # set protocols mpls interface ge-0/1/0.2
>
>  # set routing-options router-id <loopback 0 IP address>
>  # set protocols ldp interface ge-0/1/0.2
>  # set protocols ldp transport-address router-id
>
>
>  For Juniper (JunOSe):
>
>  #(config)# mpls
>  #(config)# mpls ldp
>
>  #(config)# interface g1/0
>  #(config-if)# mpls
>  #(config-if)# mpls ldp
>
>
>
>  Any idea what the issue could be?
>
>
>  Regards,
>  Junaid
>