[j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy

a. rahman isnaini rst / netsoft risnaini at netsoft.net.id
Tue Dec 30 00:43:25 EST 2008


:) May be simplicity of configuration is one of the purpose.
For me two terms are fine, it gives more flexibility in the future/soon 
in case.

a. rahman isnaini rangkayo sutan.

Masood Ahmad Shah wrote:
> What's wrong in using two terms J
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Masood
> 
>  
> 
> From: Ahmad Alhady [mailto:ahmad.alhady at yahoo.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 10:23 PM
> To: Masood Ahmad Shah; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy
> 
>  
> 
> but in 2 different terms !!!
> 
> not in same term !?
> 
> I was asking about same term ?!
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: Masood Ahmad Shah <masood at nexlinx.net.pk>
> To: Ahmad Alhady <ahmad.alhady at yahoo.com>; juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 8:14:11 PM
> Subject: RE: [j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy
> 
> The following configuration should work for IPv6/IPv4 in same policy. 
> 
> policy-statement O-R {
>     term 1 {
>         from {
>             protocol ospf;
>             route-filter fec0:0:0:4::/64 orlonger;
>         }
>         then accept;
>     }              
> 
> term 2 {
>     from {
>         protocol ospf;
>         route-filter 10.0.6.0/24 orlonger;
>     }
>     then accept;
> }
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Masood 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ahmad Alhady
> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 9:52 PM
> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] merging IPv6 and IPv4 route in same policy
> 
> can we merge matching IPv6 and IPv4 routes in same config ???
> for example 
> 
> 
> policy-statement O-R {
>     term 1 {
>         from {
>             protocol ospf;
>             route-filter 10.0.6.0/24 orlonger;
>             route-filter fec0:0:0:4::/64 orlonger;
>         }
>         then accept;
>     }              
> 
> 
> he is giving me this message!!!!!
> 
>   Policy: invalid prefix fec0:0:0:4::/64 for family inet
> error: configuration check-out failed
> 
> 
> 
> Ahmad
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 
> 
> 


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list