[j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 72, Issue 11

[Richard A Steenbergen]

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 02:35:30PM +0100, Antonio Del Bianco wrote:
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
>  thanks for pointing that out. In fact that is a known PR (problem
>  report) which is tracked with number 397439 and the fix for it is
>  currently being included into 9.1.
> 
>  We found that out last month as soon as we got a Customer reporting
>  a similar problem through a case opened with the Juniper Technical
>  Assistance Center.

Afraid not. My case was opened November 6 2007, led to PR286089, and has
the same symptoms of exporting dst ifindex and nexthop fields populated
with 0's on certain MX interfaces (around 3/4th of them for me). It is
definitely not fixed in any current code.

>  If you happen to hit an issue or discover any misbehaviour in JunOS
>  which hasnt been caught during our systesting prior the official release,
>  please let us know and we can work on getting that fixed.

I'll be polite and not answer that one.

-- 
Richard A Steenbergen <ras at e-gerbil.net>       http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)