[j-nsp] Best practises for BGP/IGP interaction
Tore Anderson
tore at linpro.no
Tue Nov 25 04:03:26 EST 2008
Hi,
I'm setting up two data centres that'll look something like this (very
simplified):
IGP A1 ------------ IGP A2
| |
| |
BGP A1 ------------ BGP A2
| Site A |
| ======== |
| Site B |
BGP B1 ------------ BGP B2
| |
| |
IGP B1 ------------ IGP B2
The routers marked BGP are Juniper MX-es, and terminate transit and
peering links. The ones marked IGP are Juniper EX-es, running VRRP on
edge VLANs or routing things onward to other firewalls/routers/etc. I
don't have any route reflectors. The IGP is OSPF.
I'm wondering if my following plans makes sense or if there's another
set of best practises I should consider - Juniper is a bit new to me,
still, and I kind of just picked up things as I went along with Cisco
too..
Anyway:
1) the BGP routers will all have a 0/0 discard route they'll inject into
OSPF, to make sure the IGP routers knows how to route to external
destinations. (Same as "default-information originate" in Cisco.)
Is there any other way to accomplish this, by the way?
2) the BGP routers will have configured a very high cost on the
interfaces connected to the IGP routers.
This is to prevent iBGP sessions between, say, BGP A1 and A2 to be
routed via IGP A1+A2 if the link between BGP A1 and A2 failed. If that
happened, it would cause a routing loop between BGP A1 and IGP A1 for
packets with external destinations connected to BGP A2 (and vice verca),
correct?
Better that the packet takes a detour via the BGP speakers in site B
then, right?
Best regards,
--
Tore Anderson
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list