[j-nsp] v6 BGP Policy Bug?

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday 15 April 2009 04:47:49 pm Richard A Steenbergen 
wrote:

> Are you talking about an explicit "then accept" final
> term, or an implicit default-action accept?

Explicit. Still debugging...

> Once upon a
> time I saw a nice table of the protocol-specific
> default-action defaults, but I can't find it now as
> Juniper's search is returning 99% xml results.

You're probably looking for:

http://tinyurl.com/d2r94u

> On the subject of impossible dreams that would make
> troubleshooting these kinds of things easier, it would be
> really handy if "test policy" supported policy chains and
> logical-routers. Actually it would be nice if you could
> change the output from something other than "brief", and
> control the input with something more than a single
> prefix doing "orlonger" matching too. I wonder why they
> didn't just do this as part of "show route" so you get
> consistent features?

Aye :-).

Cheers,

Mark.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20090415/a2156353/attachment.bin>