[j-nsp] Interconnecting logical routers via FPC3-E
Robert Kern
cj11st at gmail.com
Sat Apr 18 13:08:50 EDT 2009
Thanks guys for your answers.
BR
Robert
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Erdem Sener <erdems at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK lt- interfaces are treated like any other interface from a
> firewall/policer and CoS perspective; e.g:
>
> unit 0 {
> encapsulation ethernet;
> peer-unit 1;
> family inet {
> policer {
> input policer_500meg;
> output policer_500meg;
> }
> address 12.12.12.1/30;
> }
> }
>
> router> show interfaces lt-11/3/0.0 extensive | match policer
> Policer: Input: policer_500meg-lt-11/3/0.0-inet-i, Output:
> policer_500meg-lt-11/3/0.0-inet-o
>
> Furthermore, in a MX platform, you can use a port in 'tunnel services'
> mode (without requiring
> a services (tunnel, AS, MS) PIC, where you can also specify the
> bandwitdh, such as:
>
> erdem at mx-re0# show chassis
> redundancy {
> failover {
> on-loss-of-keepalives;
> }
> graceful-switchover;
> }
> routing-engine {
> on-disk-failure disk-failure-action reboot;
> }
> fpc 11 {
> pic 3 {
> tunnel-services {
> bandwidth 10g; #### this is a 10gig ethernet port
> }
> }
> }
>
> erdem at mx-re0# set chassis fpc 11 pic 3 tunnel-services bandwidth ?
> Possible completions:
> 1g 1 gigabit per second <<<<<< you may choose to
> use it as a 1gig 'tunnel' interface.
> 10g 10 gigabits per second
>
> This would effectively create interfaces such as vt-11/3/0, lt-11/3/0,
> gr-11/3/0, mt-11/3/0 etc.
>
> HTH,
> Erdem
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Stacy W. Smith <stacy at acm.org> wrote:
> > There are different Tunnel PICs depending upon the type of FPC in which
> they
> > are being installed. Each of these offer differing amounts of tunnel
> > bandwidth. The PB-TUNNEL is for Type 3 FPCs and is inherently limited to
> > 10Gbps of tunneling bandwidth. See page 3 of
> > http://www.juniper.net/us/en/local/pdf/datasheets/1000092-en.pdf for
> more
> > details.
> >
> > I'm pretty QOS illiterate, so I don't know if you might be able to apply
> > policers to lt interfaces to further limit the bandwidth. Maybe someone
> else
> > can comment on this.
> >
> > --Stacy
> >
> >
> > On Apr 18, 2009, at 3:44 AM, Robert Kern wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Stacy,
> >>
> >> thanks for answer. Is there a way to limit the traffic between
> >> logical-routers to 10Ge for example and what is the bandwidth limitation
> for
> >> a tunnel between LRs.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Stacy W. Smith <stacy at acm.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 17, 2009, at 10:57 PM, Robert Kern wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> I have a question about interconnection logical-routers on M320 via
> >> FPC3-E.
> >> Interconnection should be internal (not via physical ports) and limited
> to
> >> 10Ge for example.
> >>
> >> What kind of configuration do I need for such logical connection - I
> >> belive
> >> no other HW is needed for that.
> >>
> >> Tnx for answers.
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >> You need a logical tunnel (lt) interface. That requires either a tunnel
> >> PIC, AS PIC, or MS PIC.
> >>
> >> Assuming you have an lt interface, the configuration looks like this:
> >>
> >> logical-systems {
> >> R11 {
> >> interfaces {
> >> lt-1/1/0 {
> >> unit 2 {
> >> description "R11 LR to Default LR on unit 1";
> >> encapsulation vlan;
> >> vlan-id 1;
> >> peer-unit 1;
> >> family inet {
> >> address 192.168.21.6/30;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> }
> >> }
> >> }
> >> }
> >> interfaces {
> >> lt-1/1/0 {
> >> unit 1 {
> >> description "Default LR to R11 LR on unit 2";
> >> encapsulation vlan;
> >> vlan-id 1;
> >> peer-unit 2;
> >> family inet {
> >> address 192.168.21.5/30;
> >> }
> >> }
> >> }
> >> }
> >>
> >> --Stacy
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list