[j-nsp] EX3200 Interface Strangeness

Bill Blackford BBlackford at nwresd.k12.or.us
Mon Aug 17 10:41:56 EDT 2009


That makes sense. I'm not at all happy with it, but it makes sense. I'm am using ge-0/1/0 which must correspond to ge-0/0/20.

Thanks.

-b

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Mainer [mailto:mmainer at tekinside.com] 
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 7:39 AM
To: Bill Blackford
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX3200 Interface Strangeness

The 3200 is setup so that if an uplink Mod is installed you loose the 
last X ports.  Example:   you have a 24x10/100/1000 with 4x1GigE card.  
If/when ports are active on this 4x1GigE card ports 20-23 become 
INACTIVE.  They are mutely exclusive. 

-Mike Mainer



Bill Blackford wrote:
> I'm experiencing a weird issue with an interface that seems to have vanished. (see below 1.)
> I also have a general question on how the EX platform indexes interfaces. (see below 2.)
>
> =================================================
> 1. Vanishing Interface
>
> I have several ex3200's in production and noticed that ge-0/0/20 shows up in the config, but doesn't appear to exist.
>
> bblackford at wsc-sw-ex3200-1> show chassis hardware
> Hardware inventory:
> Item             Version  Part number  Serial number     Description
> Chassis                                BH0208188142      EX3200-24T
> FPC 0            REV 07   750-021261   BH0208188142      EX3200-24T, 8 POE
>   CPU                     BUILTIN      BUILTIN           FPC CPU
>   PIC 0                   BUILTIN      BUILTIN           24x 10/100/1000 Base-T
>   PIC 1          REV 04   711-021270   AR0209216364      4x GE SFP
>     Xcvr 0                NON-JNPR     FFX20H700284      SFP-SX
> Power Supply 0   REV 02   740-020957   AT0508119769      PS 320W AC
> Fan Tray                                                 Fan Tray
>
> bblackford at wsc-sw-ex3200-1> show version
> Hostname: wsc-sw-ex3200-1
> Model: ex3200-24t
> JUNOS Base OS boot [9.5R2.7]
>
> bblackford at wsc-sw-ex3200-1> show chassis fpc pic-status
> Slot 0   Online       EX3200-24T, 8 POE
>   PIC 0  Online       24x 10/100/1000 Base-T
>   PIC 1  Online       4x GE SFP
>
>
> Now,
>
> bblackford at wsc-sw-ex3200-1> show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/20
> unit 0 {
>     family ethernet-switching {
>         vlan {
>             members VOIP;
>         }
>     }
> }
>
> bblackford at wsc-sw-ex3200-1> show interfaces ge-0/0/20
> error: device ge-0/0/20 not found
>
>
> snmpwalk from a host:
> ifDescr.148 = STRING: ge-0/0/18
> ifDescr.149 = STRING: ge-0/0/18.0
> ifDescr.150 = STRING: ge-0/0/19
> ifDescr.151 = STRING: ge-0/0/19.0
>                                    <<====== 152 and 153 are missing
> ifDescr.154 = STRING: ge-0/0/21
> ifDescr.155 = STRING: ge-0/0/21.0
> ifDescr.156 = STRING: ge-0/0/22
> ifDescr.157 = STRING: ge-0/0/22.0
> ifDescr.158 = STRING: ge-0/0/1.0
> ifDescr.159 = STRING: ge-0/0/23
> ifDescr.160 = STRING: ge-0/0/0
> ifDescr.161 = STRING: ge-0/0/0.0
> ifDescr.162 = STRING: ge-0/0/1
> ifDescr.163 = STRING: vlan
> ifDescr.164 = STRING: vlan.0
> ifDescr.165 = STRING: vlan.1
> ifDescr.166 = STRING: ge-0/1/0
> ifDescr.167 = STRING: ge-0/1/0.0
> ifDescr.170 = STRING: ge-0/0/23.0
>
>
> ======================================================
> 2. Indexing question
> During the gathering of data for issue 1 above, I ran some walks against other ex3200's I have and noticed that the indexing is not consistent.
> Here's another ex3200 running the same code rev as above:
> ifDescr.148 = STRING: ge-0/0/18
> ifDescr.149 = STRING: ge-0/0/18.0
> ifDescr.150 = STRING: ge-0/0/19
> ifDescr.151 = STRING: ge-0/0/19.0
> ifDescr.152 = STRING: ge-0/0/20
> ifDescr.153 = STRING: ge-0/0/20.0
> ifDescr.154 = STRING: ge-0/0/21
> ifDescr.155 = STRING: ge-0/0/21.0
> ifDescr.156 = STRING: ge-0/0/22
> ifDescr.157 = STRING: ge-0/0/22.0
> ifDescr.158 = STRING: ge-0/0/23
> ifDescr.159 = STRING: ge-0/0/23.0
> ifDescr.160 = STRING: vlan
> ifDescr.163 = STRING: ge-0/0/0
> ifDescr.164 = STRING: ge-0/0/0.0
> ifDescr.165 = STRING: ge-0/0/1
> ifDescr.166 = STRING: ge-0/0/11.69
> ifDescr.167 = STRING: ge-0/0/11.70
> ifDescr.168 = STRING: ge-0/0/1.0
>
> There seems to be no correlation between the ifDescr seq numbers and the interface names. Now, the switch above has a 4x GE SFP PIC and the one below does not, but I find it strange that interfaces show up all over the place as if they were dynamically populated into a table.
> ==============================================
>
> Sorry for the length of this post.
> Thank you for any input.
>
> -b
>
>
> --
> Bill Blackford                     
> Senior Network Engineer            
> Technology Systems Group           
> Northwest Regional ESD             
>
> my /home away from home
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>   


More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list