[j-nsp] uRPF and 0.0.0.0/0
Clue Store
cluestore at gmail.com
Tue Aug 25 11:06:01 EDT 2009
I should have included some additional info in my original post. It
"appears" that the default is not just accepting all packets as per the show
commands below.
max at m10i> show firewall log
Log :
Time Filter Action Interface Protocol Src
Addr Dest Addr
10:04:21 pfe A ge-1/0/0.462 TCP
200.1.1.21 208.66.60.31
10:04:18 pfe A ge-1/0/0.462 TCP
200.1.1.21 208.66.60.31
10:00:36 pfe A ge-1/0/0.462 ICMP
216.187.124.117 208.83.95.203
10:00:36 pfe A ge-1/0/0.462 ICMP
216.187.124.178 208.83.95.203
10:00:36 pfe A ge-1/0/0.462 ICMP
216.187.124.106 208.83.95.203
09:58:23 pfe A ge-1/0/0.462 TCP
197.37.1.49 74.113.89.49
09:58:20 pfe A ge-1/0/0.462 TCP
197.37.1.49 74.113.89.49
An also a
max at JuniperM10i> show interfaces ge-1/0/0.462 extensive
Logical interface ge-1/0/0.462 (Index 70) (SNMP ifIndex 80) (Generation
136)
Flags: SNMP-Traps VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.462 ] Encapsulation: ENET2
Traffic statistics:
Input bytes : 467896977932
Output bytes : 285570117310
Input packets: 610042022
Output packets: 694086375
IPv6 transit statistics:
Input bytes : 0
Output bytes : 0
Input packets: 0
Output packets: 0
Local statistics:
Input bytes : 117353676
Output bytes : 1303699876
Input packets: 900649
Output packets: 1656364
Transit statistics:
Input bytes : 467779624256 53061464 bps
Output bytes : 284266417434 23944592 bps
Input packets: 609141373 8724 pps
Output packets: 692430011 10148 pps
IPv6 transit statistics:
Input bytes : 0
Output bytes : 0
Input packets: 0
Output packets: 0
Protocol inet, MTU: 1500, Generation: 141, Route table: 0
* Flags: uRPF
RPF Failures: Packets: 1807, Bytes: 100458*
Filters: Input: netflow, Output: netflow
Addresses, Flags: Is-Preferred Is-Primary
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> wrote:
>
> On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:51 PM, Clue Store wrote:
>
> Does this config hose up uRPF (either loose
>> or strict)??
>>
>
> There's an 'allow-default' option for Cisco routers, unsure about Juniper -
> but would be surprised if there isn't one for Js, as well.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
>
> Sorry, sometimes I mistake your existential crises for technical
> insights.
>
> -- xkcd #625
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list