[j-nsp] ISIS and BFD
Johannes Resch
jr at xor.at
Tue Dec 29 03:01:31 EST 2009
On Tue, December 29, 2009 08:31, Pekka Savola wrote:
> [..]
> The spec says forming adjacencies SHOULD typically be blocked, but
> there's a lot of text there so read the full story:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bfd-generic-05#section-4.1
To me it seems that this particular point is currently not clearly defined
(see also the differing views on this in this thread:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtg-bfd/current/msg00745.html).
Looking at the implementations of three particular vendors, all three of
them behave differently in this regard.
BR,
-jr
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list