[j-nsp] Cant load share in Agregated sonet

[Nilesh Khambal]

try, these things in the same order one at time and see if one of them 
makes any difference.

1. Remove "equal-weighted-mode". Check load-balancing

2. Remove "indexed-next-hop" and add "no-next-hop-cloning" Check 
load-balancing.

load-balance {
     no-next-hop-cloning;
}


Thanks,
Nilesh.

As ad Arafat wrote:
> Nilesh,
> 
> Sorry to bothering you again, as JTAC suggestion, i had apply the
> forwarding-option configuration at the both side of PE:
> 
> load-balance {
>     equal-weighted-mode;
>     indexed-next-hop;
> }
> hash-key {
>     family inet {
>         layer-3;
>         layer-4;
>     }
>     family mpls {
>         label-1;
>         label-2;
>         payload {
>             ip;
>         }
>     }
> }
> 
> But it still cant load-share in the bandwith,  :(
> PE1.batam "sh int as1 detail"
> 
> Logical interface as1.0 (Index 72) (SNMP ifIndex 133) (Generation 248)
>     Flags: Point-To-Point SNMP-Traps 0x4000 Encapsulation: PPP
>     Statistics        Packets        pps         Bytes          bps
>     Bundle:
>         Input :    1469518591      26072  515087563009     66790808
>         Output:    1479039012      25262  764318666407    106322328
>     Link:
>       so-0/1/1.0
>         Input :    1440546432      25294  498347148297     63414280
>         Output:     560001305       8109  123610734671     13742872
>       so-0/1/0.0
>         Input :      28972159        778   16740414712      3376528
>         Output:     919037707      17153  640707931736     92579456
> 
> With this this bandwidth it seem 2 x stm-1 underutilized and the
> traffic over this interface experiencing heavy congestion.
> Do you have any suggestion to workaround this?
> If we remove the sonet links from aggregated sonet and created two
> independent sonet interface  do we have 2 x stm-1 bandwidth?
> 
> Thanks before
> 
> Best Regads
> 
> 
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:34 PM, As ad Arafat <asad.arafat at gmail.com> wrote:
>> hehehe :D
>>
>> Thanks Nilesh
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Nilesh Khambal <nkhambal at juniper.net> wrote:
>>> I see that you have a JTAC case opened. So I will shut up now :) and let
>>> JTAC drive it forward.
>>>
>>> Just as a note, load balancing in JUNOS, largely depends on what kind of
>>> traffic you are trying to load balace. I am sure JTAC will ask you about it
>>> during the progress of the case. Unfortunately, there is no one solution
>>> that fits all the traffic patterns. It needs to be fine tuned as per your
>>> your requirement.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Nilesh.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 17, 2009, at 9:49 PM, "As ad Arafat" <asad.arafat at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nilesh,
>>>>
>>>> I already  add "family inet" as hash-key on both PE, but it still cant
>>>> achieve load sharing in as1
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> As'ad
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Nilesh Khambal <nkhambal at juniper.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Is it the traffic coming in from "pacnet" vrf that you are trying to load
>>>>> balance when going over as1 towards MPLS cloud? If so, I think you should
>>>>> configure "family inet" hashing as well on the PE.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Nilesh
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As ad Arafat wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Nilesh,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I attached  "show route a.b.c.d extensive" and "show route
>>>>>> forwarding-table destination a.b.c.d extensive"
>>>>>> i use hash like this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hash-key {
>>>>>>  family mpls {
>>>>>>      label-1;
>>>>>>      payload {
>>>>>>          ip;
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>  }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Nilesh Khambal <nkhambal at juniper.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Can you please send the output of below 2 commands for the destination
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> you want to load balance?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "show route a.b.c.d extensive"
>>>>>>> "show route forwarding-table destination a.b.c.d extensive"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What kind of hashing have you configured under "edit
>>>>>>> forwarding-options"?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Nilesh.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As ad Arafat wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi list,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I got m7i and m10i linked aggregated sonet interface with 2 sonet
>>>>>>>> interface inside it.
>>>>>>>> I already add load-balancing per-packet policy and forwarding-option
>>>>>>>> cinfiguration
>>>>>>>> But one of sonet interface seem underutilized.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any workaround for this issue?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best Regads
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Asad
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>> <PE1.Equinix6>
>>>> <PE1.Batam6>
>