[j-nsp] route into inactive state
Joseph Soricelli
joe at proteus.net
Wed Feb 25 15:54:12 EST 2009
If you want the BGP route to be in the table but not active you will
need that same route in inet.0 from a different protocol with a lower
protocol preference.
I'm trying to get a better idea of the ultimate goal here. I'm
assuming that you are not in the forwarding path for the routes in
question and that the advertised BGP routes will have traffic flowing
across different routers in the network. If these assumptions are
correct (and you know what happens when you assume!!) then you could
add a static route to discard which will be active in inet.0 and make
the bgp routes inactive.
-joe
Joseph Soricelli
JNCIE #14/ CCIE #4803
703-980-3999
joe at proteus.net
On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:56 AM, fighter worker wrote:
> i tried that but that route iam no longer able to send it to other bgp
> peers,, i need that route to be inactive in my routing table but still
> can advertise it to other bgp peers
>
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Stefan Fouant <sfouant at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:53 AM, fighter worker <knowhowccie at gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>> but if i filter it out it wont be in routing table also so i wont be
>>> able to send it to other bgp peers using advertise-inactive
>>
>> There are probably multiple ways to accomplish this goal. One way
>> would be to use an import policy and set the next-hop to something
>> that is not reachable. If the next-hop is not reachable then the
>> route will not be made active. There are other ways, but this is
>> just
>> one example.
>> --
>> Stefan Fouant
>>
>> Windows XP crashed.
>> I am the Blue Screen of Death.
>> No one hears your screams.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list