[j-nsp] OSPF default problem

Cord MacLeod cordmacleod at gmail.com
Tue Jan 20 16:44:20 EST 2009


You are correct, but I haven't even setup the machine network as of  
yet.  I simply am attempting to get 10.0.0.* to be able to hit the  
Internet using gatway 10.0.0.1.



On Jan 20, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Joe Freeman wrote:

> Without a gateway that exists in both the 10.0.1.0/24 and the  
> 10.0.0.0/23 networks, nothing on the 10.0.1.0/24 will be able to hit  
> an address on the 10.0.0.0/24 space.
>
> You do realize that 10.0.0.0/23 overlaps with 10.0.1.0/24 so that  
> the gateway will see 10.0.1.0/24 as part of the larger 0.0/23  
> supernet locally attached and will simply arp for any 10.0.1.0/24  
> address. However, hosts with 10.0.1.0/24 addresses will see any  
> address on 10.0.0.0/23 as being on a different subnet and as such  
> will attempt to forward that traffic to their default gateway. If  
> the default gateway isn't in the 10.0.1.0/24, no traffic will be  
> sent, and the packet dropped as unreachable.
>
> Joe
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Cord MacLeod  
> <cordmacleod at gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the setup roughly.  The gateway is a 3560 switch and has a  
> vlan defined for that 10net.  There is also a static route on the  
> internet gateway to point everything 10.0.0.0/23 to 10.0.0.2.   
> 10.0.0.2 being reachable from 10.0.0.1.
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Felix Schueren wrote:
>
> Cord MacLeod wrote:
> As far as the router id, I went back to basics and looked in my junos
> cookbook and didn't skip a beat when I first set this up and it didn't
> work.  I just added in all of the steps it suggested, really nothing  
> of
> consequence.
>
> So, 10.0.0.0/24 is the network devices and 10.0.1.0/24 is the  
> machines.
> That's why I have a /23 on that interface.  Funny part is that
> particular switch with 10.0.0.2 on it locally can hit the internet and
> 10.0.0.1.  No other device can nor can I ping 10.0.0.1 with any other
> source on the local switch.
>
>
> "internet gateway"
>     |
>     |
>   10.0.0.0/23
>     |
>     |
>  "ex4200"
>     |   \
>     |    \
>     |     \
>  "other1"  "other2"
>    |         |
>    10.0.1.0/24
>    |         |
> "machines1"  "machines2"
>
> is that similiar to your setup? if it is, the "gateway" will most  
> likely
> not try to reach anything within 10.0.0.0/23 routed, instead just  
> ARPing
> on it's directly connected interface. From what I saw so far, end
> machines should be able to send packets to 10.0.0.1, but it appears  
> that
> 10.0.0.1 can't send any packets back - can you monitor traffic on
> 10.0.0.1 to verify that?
>
> -felix
>
>
> -- 
> Felix Schüren
> Head of NOC
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Host Europe GmbH - http://www.hosteurope.de
> Welserstraße 14 - D-51149 Köln - Germany
> Telefon: (0800) 4 67 83 87 - Telefax: (01805) 66 32 33
> HRB 28495 Amtsgericht Köln - UST ID DE187370678
> Geschäftsführer:
> Uwe Braun - Alex Collins - Mark Joseph - Patrick Pulvermüller
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list