[j-nsp] RE - 6. vlan-id 0 (Bit Gossip)
Mazroui Hamid
mazroui.hamid at ericsson.com
Fri Jul 10 04:26:21 EDT 2009
Hi
Re//
Experts,
do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0?
According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
"VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which the
frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to any
VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is
referred to as a priority tag"
How would I match this Juniper config:
show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0
vlan-tagging;
unit 0 {
vlan-id 0;
family inet {
address 1.1.1.1/30;
}
}
on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from
1?
Instead of configuring a subinterface configure ip under the main
interface:
//r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ?
<1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required
r2(config-if)#ip address a.a.a.a m.m.m.m
<1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required
Thanks,
bit
>Hamid Mazroui
>Service Engineer RA/EMO
ERICSSON ///
>Business Center Aile Sud
>Lot IB/S3 Hay Ryad-Rabat
>Mobile : +212661798439
>Email : mazroui.hamid at ericsson.com
>
-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:12 PM
To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 80, Issue 10
Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to
juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
juniper-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
juniper-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS) (Terry Baranski)
2. sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (Abhi)
3. Re: sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (masood at nexlinx.net.pk)
4. Re: sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (sthaug at nethelp.no)
5. Re: sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (Timo Mohre)
6. vlan-id 0 (Bit Gossip)
7. Re: sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7 (Abhi)
8. Re: vlan-id 0 (Nalkhande Tarique Abbas)
9. Re: vlan-id 0 (masood at nexlinx.net.pk)
10. Re: vlan-id 0 (masood at nexlinx.net.pk)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:18:35 -0400
From: "Terry Baranski" <tbaranski at mail.com>
To: <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Multiple usage of VRRP-Groups (JunOS)
Message-ID: <000501ca0011$a7b4abc0$0a01a8c0 at pleth0ra>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Andrew Cheng wrote:
> is it okay to use the same VRRP-group (i.e. 20) multiple times on the
> same physical interface?
>
> We want to use more than 255 VLANs on an physical interface so we have
> to use the same group several times or use the same VRRP-group (i.e. >
> 1) on every VLAN subunit.
It works fine for us in practice, though you'll find bizarre statements
to the contrary in the JunOS documentation, such as this in 9.1 and
earlier:
"The following restrictions apply: On a single routing platform, you
cannot configure the same VRRP group on multiple interfaces"
And this in newer versions:
"On a single routing platform, you can assign a unique VRRP group to
only one interface..."
-Terry
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 03:05:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Abhi <vyaaghrah-eng at yahoo.com>
To: Juniper Puck <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7
Message-ID: <826618.28298.qm at web31814.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Hi Guys
while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am
getting the following error.
root at BOM-SC20# commit synchronize
re0:
[edit system services ssh]
'ssh'
warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found configuration check
succeeds
re1:
[edit system services ssh]
'ssh'
warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found
below is the config
services {
ssh {
protocol-version v2;
can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running by
using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd process
running,
How can i start this process.
Advice.
Regards
Abhijeet.C
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 17:28:57 +0500 (PKT)
From: masood at nexlinx.net.pk
To: "Abhi" <vyaaghrah-eng at yahoo.com>
Cc: Juniper Puck <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7
Message-ID:
<50375.196.46.241.57.1247142537.squirrel at nexmail1.nexlinx.net.pk>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
To use SSH on Juniper routers, you need to have JUNOS domestic release.
To check this out you may execute the following command?
show version
OR more specific one :) (coz i love junos UNIX like matching style)
show version | match Cryp
The above command will let you know that you are running with a crypto
package or not. If not then you have to get JUNOS domestic release
Regards,
Masood
> Hi Guys
>
> while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am
> getting the following error.
>
>
> root at BOM-SC20# commit synchronize
> re0:
> [edit system services ssh]
> 'ssh'
> warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found configuration
> check succeeds
> re1:
> [edit system services ssh]
> 'ssh'
> warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found
>
> below is the config
>
> services {
> ssh {
> protocol-version v2;
>
> can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running by
> using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd process
> running,
>
> How can i start this process.
> Advice.
>
> Regards
> Abhijeet.C
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:34:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: sthaug at nethelp.no
To: vyaaghrah-eng at yahoo.com
Cc: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7
Message-ID: <20090709.133435.71123571.sthaug at nethelp.no>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
> while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am
getting the following error.
Completely expected if you're running the non-domestic version of the
JunOS software.
> can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running by
> using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd process
> running,
You need to install the domestic version
(jinstall-*-domestic-signed.tgz) which has ssh support.
Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:22:53 +0200
From: Timo Mohre <timo at tiscali.net>
To: Abhi <vyaaghrah-eng at yahoo.com>
Cc: Juniper Puck <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7
Message-ID: <4A55D30D.5000207 at tiscali.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Are you using the Worrldwide junos image (no ssh) or the domestic junos
image (ssh available)?
/Timo
Abhi wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i am
getting the following error.
>
>
> root at BOM-SC20# commit synchronize
> re0:
> [edit system services ssh]
> 'ssh'
> warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found configuration
> check succeeds
> re1:
> [edit system services ssh]
> 'ssh'
> warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found
>
> below is the config
>
> services {
> ssh {
> protocol-version v2;
>
> can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running by
> using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd process
> running,
>
> How can i start this process.
> Advice.
>
> Regards
> Abhijeet.C
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkpV0w0ACgkQe5lbQTruUNXmgwCfYMgMY9ho4pV5crqMRlfj9rfK
U7gAoJC7aTr2KhV7pTl9IgCKwro40EGb
=qtuo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:43:22 +0200
From: Bit Gossip <bit.gossip at chello.nl>
To: Juniper List <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0
Message-ID: <1247143402.3416.10.camel at nlws481253>
Content-Type: text/plain
Experts,
do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0?
According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
"VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which the
frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to any
VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is
referred to as a priority tag"
How would I match this Juniper config:
show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0
vlan-tagging;
unit 0 {
vlan-id 0;
family inet {
address 1.1.1.1/30;
}
}
on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from
1?
r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ?
<1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required
Thanks,
bit
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 04:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: Abhi <vyaaghrah-eng at yahoo.com>
To: Juniper Puck <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] sshd Demon Error on Junos 9.3R1.7
Message-ID: <62852.88807.qm at web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Yup on thing is sure I am running a Junos WW version.
thanks
Guys
masood at nexlinx.net.pk wrote:
> To use SSH on Juniper routers, you need to have JUNOS domestic
> release. To check this out you may execute the following command?
> show version
> OR more specific one :) (coz i love junos UNIX like matching style)
> show version | match Cryp The above command will let you know that you
> are running with a crypto package or not. If not then you have to get
> JUNOS domestic release Regards, Masood
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> while committing the configuration after enabling the ssh service i
>> am getting the following error.
>>
>>
>> root at BOM-SC20# commit synchronize
>> re0:
>> [edit system services ssh]
>> 'ssh'
>> warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found configuration
>> check succeeds
>> re1:
>> [edit system services ssh]
>> 'ssh'
>> warning: daemon binary /usr/sbin/sshd not found
>>
>> below is the config
>>
>> services {
>> ssh {
>> protocol-version v2;
>>
>> can u suggest what could be cause. i checked in the process running
>> by using "show system process detail" could not found any sshd
>> process running,
>>
>> How can i start this process.
>> Advice.
>>
>> Regards
>> Abhijeet.C
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 19:09:33 +0530
From: Nalkhande Tarique Abbas <ntarique at juniper.net>
To: "Bit Gossip" <bit.gossip at chello.nl>, "Juniper List"
<juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0
Message-ID:
<855F9D2D4701374C950F39AD6C9D09370305D664 at emailbng5.jnpr.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Hi
AFAIK, basically a unit 32767 is created implicitly when "vlan-tagging"
is enabled to pass untagged control traffic (like STP, LACP ... etc).
When a unit with vlan-id 0 is configured, this unit itself is used to
send the control traffic. So the unit 32767 then gets deleted.
ge-1/1/0 up up
ge-1/1/0.1 up up inet 1.1.1.0/31
ge-1/1/0.2 up up inet 2.2.2.0/31
ge-1/1/0.32767 up up
root at Sulfur# show | compare
[edit interfaces ge-1/1/0]
+ unit 0 {
+ vlan-id 0;
+ }
lab at Sulfur> show interfaces terse | match ge-1/1/0
ge-1/1/0 up up
ge-1/1/0.0 up up
ge-1/1/0.1 up up inet 1.1.1.0/31
ge-1/1/0.2 up up inet 2.2.2.0/31
Thanks & Regards,
Tarique A. Nalkhande
-----Original Message-----
From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bit Gossip
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:13 PM
To: Juniper List
Subject: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0
Experts,
do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0?
According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
"VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which the
frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to any
VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is
referred to as a priority tag"
How would I match this Juniper config:
show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0
vlan-tagging;
unit 0 {
vlan-id 0;
family inet {
address 1.1.1.1/30;
}
}
on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from
1?
r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ?
<1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required
Thanks,
bit
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:20:51 +0500 (PKT)
From: masood at nexlinx.net.pk
To: "Bit Gossip" <bit.gossip at chello.nl>
Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0
Message-ID:
<12305.196.46.241.57.1247152851.squirrel at nexmail1.nexlinx.net.pk>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Some attached devices may not accept 802.1q-tagged frames, and therefore
can reside only in VLAN 0.
Conversely, some devices may accept only tagged frames, requiring that
even frames in VLAN 0 be tagged. So JUNOS is providing you the way to
deal with such boxs.. :D
The range for valid VLAN IDs on Cisco kit is 1 to 4094 with VLAN 1 being
the default VLAN. I suspect VLAN 1 might be what you are talking about
when they refer to VLAN 0.
However, to muddy the water, Cisco's documentation for the 3750 reveals
that there IS a VLAN 0 - but only when you're using VOIP
Regards,
Masood
Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/
> Experts,
> do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0?
> According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
> "VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which
> the frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to
> any VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is
> referred to as a priority tag"
>
> How would I match this Juniper config:
>
> show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0 vlan-tagging; unit 0 {
> vlan-id 0;
> family inet {
> address 1.1.1.1/30;
> }
> }
>
> on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from
> 1?
>
> r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ?
> <1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required
>
> Thanks,
> bit
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 21:15:43 +0500 (PKT)
From: masood at nexlinx.net.pk
To: "Nalkhande Tarique Abbas" <ntarique at juniper.net>
Cc: Juniper List <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0
Message-ID:
<26317.196.46.241.57.1247156143.squirrel at nexmail1.nexlinx.net.pk>
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Your configuration is missing "vlan-tagging"
Is behaviour remains the same if you add "vlan-tagging" under interface
configuration.
Regards,
Masood
Blog: http://weblogs.com.pk/jahil/
>
> Hi
>
> AFAIK, basically a unit 32767 is created implicitly when
"vlan-tagging"
> is enabled to pass untagged control traffic (like STP, LACP ... etc).
> When a unit with vlan-id 0 is configured, this unit itself is used to
> send the control traffic. So the unit 32767 then gets deleted.
>
>
>
> ge-1/1/0 up up
> ge-1/1/0.1 up up inet 1.1.1.0/31
> ge-1/1/0.2 up up inet 2.2.2.0/31
> ge-1/1/0.32767 up up
>
> root at Sulfur# show | compare
> [edit interfaces ge-1/1/0]
> + unit 0 {
> + vlan-id 0;
> + }
>
> lab at Sulfur> show interfaces terse | match ge-1/1/0
> ge-1/1/0 up up
> ge-1/1/0.0 up up
> ge-1/1/0.1 up up inet 1.1.1.0/31
> ge-1/1/0.2 up up inet 2.2.2.0/31
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Tarique A. Nalkhande
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bit Gossip
> Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:13 PM
> To: Juniper List
> Subject: [j-nsp] vlan-id 0
>
> Experts,
> do you know what is the meaning of vlan-id 0?
> According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
> "VLAN Identifier (VID): a 12-bit field specifying the VLAN to which
> the frame belongs. A value of 0 means that the frame doesn't belong to
> any VLAN; in this case the 802.1Q tag specifies only a priority and is
> referred to as a priority tag"
>
> How would I match this Juniper config:
>
> show configuration interfaces ge-0/0/0 vlan-tagging; unit 0 {
> vlan-id 0;
> family inet {
> address 1.1.1.1/30;
> }
> }
>
> on a cisco device on the other end of the cable where vlan starts from
> 1?
>
> r2(config-subif)#encapsulation dot1Q ?
> <1-4094> IEEE 802.1Q VLAN ID required
>
> Thanks,
> bit
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list
juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 80, Issue 10
*******************************************
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list