[j-nsp] JUNOS
Brendan Mannella
bmannella at teraswitch.com
Tue Jun 23 10:58:01 EDT 2009
ibr1.ash> show route all
inet.0: 283638 destinations, 486468 routes (283619 active, 18 holddown, 2 hidden )
ibr1.ash> show chassis routing-engine
Routing Engine status:
Temperature 30 degrees C / 86 degrees F
CPU temperature 28 degrees C / 82 degrees F
DRAM 768 MB
Memory utilization 89 percent
CPU utilization:
User 0 percent
Background 0 percent
Kernel 2 percent
Interrupt 0 percent
Idle 97 percent
Model RE-5.0
Serial ID
Start time 2008-11-23 14:53:50 EST
Uptime 211 days, 19 hours, 23 minutes, 19 seconds
Load averages: 1 minute 5 minute 15 minute
0.05 0.10 0.04
I have a 2gig flash card installed, so is no issue.
I am just trying to figure out if its a software issue/bug causing this or its just the number of routes i have.
Brendan Mannella
President and CEO
TeraSwitch Networks Inc.
Office: 412.224.4333 x303
Toll-Free: 866.583.6338
Mobile: 412-592-7848
Efax: 412.202.7094
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean Clarke" <sean at clarke-3.demon.nl>
To: "Brendan Mannella" <bmannella at teraswitch.com>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 10:58:24 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS
Hi Brendan
How many routes etc do you have ?
The memory sounds a bit high utilised to me, if it stays at 91%.
There are many bug fixes from 9.1 to 9.5, of course, if you have a 1G
flash card (or no flash card) then you can upgrade anyway ... the memory
should not max out.
Typically the RE should be about 5% utilised, if the routes are stable
cheers
On 6/23/09 11:45 AM, Brendan Mannella wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have two M7i routers with RE-400-768s. One is running 9.1R1.8 and the
> other 8.3R4.3.
>
> They each have one transit link landed on them and very little IBGP/OSPF.
>
> The router with 9.1 on it has 91% memory usage while the 8.3 has 59%.
>
> Now I know the more recent code probably has more features and so forth. But
> I am worried that maybe that version of code has a memory leak or related
> issue.
>
> Does anyone know of any outstanding issues with 9.1R1.8?
>
> The router came with this version of code on it and I don¹t like the fact
> that its R1.8 but I am worried about upgrading to a more stable release as I
> don¹t want the memory maxed out.
>
> Any suggestions? What is the most stable code at this point for this
> platform?
>
> Thanks in Advance.
>
> Brendan
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list