[j-nsp] Upgrade from M10i?

[Patrik Olsson]

Contact JTAC, this is some sort of strange issue I have seen with other
customers. It can be fixed, it is not a hard coded max-prefix.

Patrik

Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 05:05:52PM +0300, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
>> That is not an rlimit, that is MAXDSIZ parameter of JUNIPER-EX kernel 
>> configuration. And while it hardcoded to kernel, it can be tweaked 
>> with the help of loader.conf. 
>>
>> While this hack works, it has at least one major drawback: loader.conf 
>> is rewritten during JunOS upgrade, so, I'd prefer not to use it on
>> production networks.. 
> 
> Actually it looks like Juniper has further crippled things in rpd now. I 
> just tested this on 9.4R1 and there is now a hard-coded max-prefix which 
> doesn't seem to be turned off by any of the usual prefix-limit 
> configurations:
> 
> rpd[755]: %DAEMON-3-RPD_RT_PREFIX_LIMIT_REACHED: Number of prefixes (12288) in table inet.0 still exceeds or equals configured maximum (12288)
> rpd[755]: %DAEMON-3-RPD_RT_PREFIX_LIMIT_REACHED: Number of prefixes (1024) in table inet6.0 still exceeds or equals configured maximum (1024)
> 
> So much for that idea. :)
> 


-- 

//Patrik

Webkom
http://www.webkom.se

+46 (0)709 35 22 99
+46 (0)8 559 26 488