[j-nsp] destination nat, 8 rule limit

[Brandon Bennett]

Yes and please everyone bug your SE's about this so that it gets added as
feature request.

2009/11/6 Alexander Shikoff <minotaur at crete.org.ua>

> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:24:34PM -0600, Christopher Hobbs wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Brandon Bennett <bennetb at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Crap.
> > >
> > > 2009/11/6 Alexander Shikoff <minotaur at crete.org.ua>
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 04:01:40AM +0200, Alexander Shikoff wrote:
> > >> > On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 06:32:05PM -0700, Brandon Bennett wrote:
> > >> > > 08/17/09 05:21:01 I am not sure of the exact time, but I know that
> It
> > >> should
> > >> > > > be in version
> > >> > > > 10 of Junos.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Did they mention  what it would be increased to?
> > >> >
> > >> > IIRC 256 rules per one rule-set.
> > >>
> > >> I've just tested dst nat in 10.0R1.8.
> > >> The same:
> > >> minotaur# commit
> > >> error: Destination NAT rule-set rs-Nat and rs-Nat1 have same context.
> > >> [edit security nat destination]
> > >>  'rule-set rs-Nat1'
> > >>    Destination NAT rule-set(rs-Nat1) sanity check failed.
> > >> error: configuration check-out failed
> > >>
> > >> [edit security nat destination rule-set rs-Nat1]
> > >>
> > >> ... and only 8 rules per rule set.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> MINO-RIPE
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > Seconded.
> >
> > Maybe a ticket with Juniper would get their attention?  I'll take car of
> > that when I get into work on Tuesday.
> >
> > Thanks for the assistance, folks.
>
> Yep. I've reopened my ticket and already got a reply:
> "11/06/09 09:04:32 This may be in the next 10 version of Junos. I apologize
> but I am not
> sure when the developers expect this limitations to be fixed."
>
> If you care about this issue you may open your one. More tickets - more
> attention, though...
>
> --
> MINO-RIPE
>