[j-nsp] ASR1002 Comparitive

[Derick Winkworth]

Wouldn't an SRX-650 be a better choice if your comparing to an ASR1002?



________________________________
From: Kris Amy <Kris at amy.id.au>
To: "mtinka at globaltransit.net" <mtinka at globaltransit.net>; "juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net" <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Wed, November 18, 2009 4:48:17 AM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ASR1002 Comparitive

The plot thickens,

With sampling set to 1/100. The box is nominally at 50%.

However whenever we commit a config the box jumps to 100% cpu for approx 10
minutes. We started seeing this when I brought up 1 full bgp peer. My
Partner has an open case with JTAC for this and will let you know the
results when they come to hand.

Regards,
Kris


On 18/11/09 6:01 PM, "Mark Tinka" <mtinka at globaltransit.net> wrote:

> On Wednesday 18 November 2009 11:58:53 am Bill Blackford
> wrote:
> 
>> I believe the M7i is the closest one 2 one comparison.
>> The performance numbers are almost exact and depending on
>> your supplier should be competitively priced with an
>> ASR1002.
> 
> This is where/when I think Juniper need to re-invent the
> M7i/M10i. Even with the new Enhanced CFEB, the ASR1000's
> offer way more value, e.g., they can talk 10Gbps Ethernet or
> STM-64/OC-192, they can talk STM-16/OC-48, now support a
> 20Gbps centralized forwarding plane, support a wide range of
> line rate Gig-E line cards, e.t.c.
> 
> We've seen a number of cases where the ASR1004/6 beats an
> M10i any day, especially when used as a small core or
> medium-sized edge router. The M7i is in even worse trouble
> since the ASR1002 comes with 4x on-board Gig-E ports -
> lovely.
> 
> The M7i's/M10i's are finding it very hard to play in this
> space, anymore. This needs to be rectified.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark.

_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp