[j-nsp] Routing Instance for fxp0

Alex alex.arseniev at gmail.com
Sat Nov 28 08:05:19 EST 2009


This is correct fxp0 behaviour.
Just pick any other PFE interface for outband access and put it into 
routing-instance.
In this fashion, with dedicated OOB PFE interface, if your M7i RE fails, you 
still have OOB access to the node.
HTH
Alex

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alfred Schweder" <alf at all.de>
To: <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Cc: "Alfred Schweder" <alf at all.de>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 11:09 AM
Subject: [j-nsp] Routing Instance for fxp0


> Hello
>
> I'd like to seperate the routing instance of fxp0 for a real outband Mgmt 
> Access.
> At our ciscos we configure:
>
> ip vrf InternalMgmt
>  rd 42:42
> int eth0
> ip vrf forwarding InternalMgmt
> ip address 192.168.1.123 255.255.255.0
> ip route vrf InternalMgmt 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.1
>
> So we can make an outband mgmt acces, but the mgmt interface is seperated 
> from
> the global routing, and the network can used for other purpose.
>
>
> At junos I cant configure it the same way:
>
> alf at M7i# set routing-instances mgmt instance-type no-forwarding interface 
> fxp0.0
> alf at M7i# commit confirmed
> [edit routing-instances mgmt]
>  'interface fxp0.0'
>    RT Instance: Interface fxp0.0 not supported under routing-instances.
> error: configuration check-out failed
>
>
> Is there an other way to do this seperation ?
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> -- 
> Alf
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> 



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list