[j-nsp] Routing Instance for fxp0

Alex alex.arseniev at gmail.com
Sat Nov 28 14:20:31 EST 2009


Yes, you are right.
I should have rephrased my earlier post:
In this fashion, with dedicated OOB PFE interface, if one of redundant REs 
fails, you
still have OOB access to the node.
M7i does not have dual REs.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefan Fouant" <sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net>
To: "'Alex'" <alex.arseniev at gmail.com>; "'Alfred Schweder'" <alf at all.de>; 
<juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Cc: "'Alfred Schweder'" <alf at all.de>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Routing Instance for fxp0


>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
>> bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Alex
>> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 8:05 AM
>>
>> This is correct fxp0 behaviour.
>> Just pick any other PFE interface for outband access and put it into
>> routing-instance.
>> In this fashion, with dedicated OOB PFE interface, if your M7i RE
>> fails, you
>> still have OOB access to the node.
>
> If the RE fails, what would you be logging into?  There would be nothing
> else running mgd.
>
> Stefan Fouant
> www.shortestpathfirst.net
> GPG Key ID: 0xB5E3803D
>
> 



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list