[j-nsp] Routing Instance for fxp0
Alex
alex.arseniev at gmail.com
Sat Nov 28 14:25:09 EST 2009
So the actual goal is not the OOB vs PFE-forwarded traffic separation but
rather the opposite?
Even if you are able to achieve what you are aiming at (forward traffic
between PFE interfaces and fxp0 interface) then at certain rate it would get
throttled by PFE CPU. And this behaviour (PFE CPU throttling) is not
configurable AFAIK.
Rgds
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alfred Schweder" <alf at all.de>
To: "Alex" <alex.arseniev at gmail.com>
Cc: <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>; "Alfred Schweder" <alf at all.de>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2009 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Routing Instance for fxp0
> Hello
>
>> This is correct fxp0 behaviour.
>> Just pick any other PFE interface for outband access and put it into
>> routing-instance.
>> In this fashion, with dedicated OOB PFE interface, if your M7i RE fails,
>> you still have OOB access to the node.
>
> I tought fxp0 should be "the" dedicated OOB Interface.
> If the fxp0 would be a real freebsd local interface all would be fine.
>
> The problem I have is, that the fxp0 Network(s) are black holed for
> the normal traffic in the global context.
>
> I think switching off this side effect will be easy by turning off the
> internal bridge. Perhaps there is already a (hidden) switch ?
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Gruessen
> Dipl. Ing. A. Schweder
> Gutachten & Consulting
> Mobil +49.177.2194627 (+49.160.97639300)
>
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list