[j-nsp] ex4200 routing weirdness

Cord MacLeod cordmacleod at gmail.com
Wed Oct 14 20:58:50 EDT 2009


I have 2 switches in a 2 member virtual chassis and one of them my  
siteops knocked over.  The use ISIS for the point to point links.  BGP  
to carry the networks.  They take a default BGP route from both  
routers and reflect a default to the top of rack 6 member virtual  
chassis switch.

The 2 member switch receives 2 BGP routes from the to of rack virtual  
chassis and reflects them to the routers.

When switch in the 2 member virtual chassis died, I experienced some  
strangeness in routing:

cord at sw.sc1# run show bgp summary
Groups: 2 Peers: 3 Down peers: 0
Table          Tot Paths  Act Paths Suppressed    History Damp  
State    Pending
inet.0                 4          4          0          0           
0          0
Peer                     AS      InPkt     OutPkt    OutQ   Flaps Last  
Up/Dwn State|#Active/Received/Accepted/Damped...
10.1.1.13          65432         28         29       0       0        
11:44 1/1/1/0              0/0/0/0
10.1.1.14          65432         26         28       0       0        
10:53 1/1/1/0              0/0/0/0
10.1.1.47          65432         27         28       0       0        
11:01 2/2/2/0              0/0/0/0

unknown command.
cord at sw.sc1# run ping 10.1.1.47
PING 10.1.1.47 (10.1.1.47): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
64 bytes from 10.1.1.47: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.366 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.47: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.277 ms
ping: sendto: No route to host
64 bytes from 10.1.1.47: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1.289 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.47: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1.584 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.47: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=2.260 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.47: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=1.327 ms
ping: sendto: No route to host

cord at sw1.sc1# run ping 10.1.1.13
PING 10.1.1.13 (10.1.1.13): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.1.1.13: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.062 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.13: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.907 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.13: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=1.015 ms
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to host

cord at sw1.sc1# run ping 10.1.1.14
PING 10.1.1.14 (10.1.1.14): 56 data bytes
ping: sendto: No route to host
ping: sendto: No route to host
64 bytes from 10.1.1.14: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.899 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.1.14: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.824 ms
ping: sendto: No route to host


10.1.1.47 = top of rack switch
10.1.1.13 = router 1
10.1.1.14 = router 2



cord at sw1.sc1# run show isis adjacency
Interface             System         L State        Hold (secs) SNPA
ge-0/0/0.0            edge2.sc1      2  Up                   24  0:1f: 
12:d2:d0:db
ge-0/0/1.0            edge1.sc1      2  Up                   22  0:1f: 
12:d3:60:2
ge-0/0/23.0           gsw1.sc1       2  Up                    6   
0:23:9c:10:20:2f

cord at sw1.sc1# show virtual-chassis
no-split-detection;
member 0 {
     mastership-priority 200;
}
member 1 {
     mastership-priority 200;
}

{master:0}[edit]
cord at sw1.sc1# run show virtual-chassis

Virtual Chassis ID: 0023.9c0b.db01
                                           Mastership             
Neighbor List
Member ID  Status   Serial No    Model    priority    Role      ID   
Interface
0 (FPC 0)  Prsnt    xxxx ex4200-24t      200  Master*
1 (FPC 1)  NotPrsnt xxxx ex4200-24t


Anyone have any idea what this could be?  Also, even though the BGP  
routes for the machines were in the routing table, I could access no  
machines on the top of rack switch, nor the top of rack switch  
itself.  Running 9.3R4.






More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list