[j-nsp] Load balacing issue - M7i
Dilip Srivastava
dilipjetking at gmail.com
Mon Sep 21 08:35:29 EDT 2009
Hi,
I want to create a batch file on juniper router(M120) please suggest me with
the step and disadvantages for the network (if any)
Thanks
Dilip Kumar
965410022
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Shankar <shankarks at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for that info Benny. In a leyr 3 environmet, Label 1 should be VPN
> label, and label 2 should be MPLS label....
>
> Cheer
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:42 AM, Benny Sumitro <benny.sumitro at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > AFAIK, payload ip will only makes the router to use 5 least significant
> > bits of DA in the hashing algorithm.
> >
> > For the label 1, i still confuse if the router uses top label which is
> > transport mpls label or bottom label which is vpn label. Maybe the
> experts
> > here can shed a light on this :)
> >
> > BR,
> > Benny
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Shiva Shankar <shankarks at gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Gebts Ladies.....A quick question on load balancing on juniper M7i
> >> running Junos 8.4R2..The config I have on the router is:
> >>
> >> family mpls { label-1; payload { ip; } }
> >>
> >> The documentation says, for load-balacing (or load sharing per flow),
> the
> >> above uses label-1 (which is VPN label) and bits of IPv4 addess..My
> >> question
> >> is, (i) does it includes all the bits in an IPv4 address or just few
> bits
> >> of IPv4 address? cheers
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
More information about the juniper-nsp
mailing list