[j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos

[Gabriel Farias]

Stefan,

Any suggestions to correct this imbalance?

Thanks,
Gabriel Farias

2010/4/1 Gabriel Farias <gabrielfarias03 at gmail.com>

> Sorry for my bad translation, follows the configuration:
>
> *Interfaces*:
> show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/0
> description "*BA* G2/47 - SW001";
> gigether-options {
>     802.3ad ae0;
> }
> show configuration interfaces ge-3/0/3
> description "*BA* G1/47 - SW001";
> gigether-options {
>     802.3ad ae0;
> }
> show configuration interfaces ae0
> description "*BA* Po150 - SW001";
> mtu 9192;
> unit 0 {
>     family inet {
>         address 10.251.40.53/30;
>     }
> }
>
> *VRF instances*:
> show configuration routing-instances dados
> instance-type vrf;
> interface ae0.0;
> ...
> protocols {
>     bgp {
>         group PEER-SW001 {
>             type external;
>             hold-time 30;
>             peer-as 65100;
>             as-override;
>             neighbor 10.251.40.54;
>         }
>     }
>
> What I need is to balance the outbound traffic of physical interfaces, see
> that is constant unbalance
>
> {master}
> RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate
>   Input rate     : 271677184 bps (69055 pps)
>   Output rate    : 37802544 bps (10429 pps)
>
> {master}
> RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate
>   Input rate     : 293302512 bps (61095 pps)
>   Output rate    : 628471504 bps (134276 pps)
>
> {master}
> RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/0 | match rate
>   Input rate     : 298597864 bps (70456 pps)
>   Output rate    : 34856992 bps (8756 pps)
>
> {master}
> RT110> show interfaces ge-3/0/3 | match rate
>   Input rate     : 288075200 bps (57232 pps)
>   Output rate    : 657782056 bps (129224 pps)
>
>
>
>
> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net>
>
>> I'm sorry, your request is getting lost in translation. Why don't you just
>> show us your configs and do a 'show route x.x.x.x' and 'show route
>> forwarding-table destination x.x.x.x' for the route you are trying to
>> load-balance.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Stefan Fouant
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>> ------------------------------
>> *From: * Gabriel Farias <gabrielfarias03 at gmail.com>
>> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:51:04 -0300
>> *To: *<sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net>
>> *Cc: *<juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net>; <juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> >
>> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos
>>
>> I'm not using EBGP external type in PE (M120)
>>
>> Reagards,
>> Gabriel Farias
>>
>> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net>
>>
>>> Do you have multi-path enabled on your EBGP sessions?
>>>
>>> Stefan Fouant
>>>
>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>> ------------------------------
>>> *From: * Gabriel Farias <gabrielfarias03 at gmail.com>
>>> *Date: *Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:32:18 -0300
>>> *To: *<sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net>
>>> *Cc: *<juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net>; <
>>> juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos
>>>
>>> I have a section between EBGP VRF PE x CE via two physical connections
>>> (aggregate ethernet) and see the traffic unbalanced because the Junos uses
>>> the default flow.
>>>
>>> I need the traffic between the PE x CE is symmetrically balanced way, the
>>> previous setting and did not work, and within the configuration
>>> routing-instance <name> not have all the options.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Gabriel Farias
>>>
>>> 2010/3/31 Stefan Fouant <sfouant at shortestpathfirst.net>
>>>
>>>> You need the following:
>>>>
>>>> 'set routing-option forwarding-table export load-balance'
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> 'set policy-options policy-statement load-balance then load-balance
>>>> per-packet'
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the top-post, I'm on my Blackberry.
>>>>
>>>> HTHs.
>>>>
>>>> Stefan Fouant
>>>> ------Original Message------
>>>> From: Gabriel Farias
>>>> Sender: juniper-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>>>> To: juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> Subject: [j-nsp] Load Balance in VRF by Junos
>>>> Sent: Mar 31, 2010 4:23 PM
>>>>
>>>> Hi members,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> How to balance traffic between EBGP equipment Juniper M120 (PE) x Cisco
>>>> 6509
>>>> (CE) Switch, which are connected via ethernet aggregated?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I used the setup below and did not work the Juniper continues with the
>>>> output unbalanced traffic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> configuration forwarding-options
>>>>
>>>> load-balance {
>>>>    indexed-next-hop;
>>>> }
>>>> hash-key {
>>>>    family inet {
>>>>        layer-3;
>>>>        layer-4;
>>>>    }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Gabriel Farias
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>