[j-nsp] EX4200 filter buggy?

Gavin Tweedie gav at narx.net
Sun Dec 12 21:51:26 EST 2010


On 3/12/2010 6:46 PM, Charlie Allom wrote:
> I have tried 10.0R2.10, 10.0S10.1 and 10.0R4.7 - they are all the same.
> We only have 165 terms.

We're hitting the exact same issue on a EX4200 with 9.6R3.8, which we're 
stuck on because of a bug preventing us from upgrading to Junos10. We 
have 256 terms which are matching on source IP without issue. Once each 
term is changed to match on 3 items per term rather than 1 the errors begin.

I also have a case open with JTAC.

Gavin



More information about the juniper-nsp mailing list