[j-nsp] EX unsupported filter policer and actions on loopback lo0

[Mark Tinka]

On Saturday, December 18, 2010 07:23:48 am Richard A 
Steenbergen wrote:

> To a certain extent, it still is one JUNOS. When they add
> a new BGP feature you're going to get that feature on
> every box, from your T1600 routing hundreds of gigabits,
> all the way down to your J-series box terminating a T1.

But that's just platform-independent code, which is true 
also of Cisco with the multitude of options you get when 
choosing code for a box.

> If you go into it comparing it against a
> 6509 instead of an MX, you'll come away with a
> completely different take on the product.

Well, as anaemic as the SUP720 is, it has pretty decent MPLS 
tech. Yes, it's probably more comparable to the EX8200, but 
it comes in a range of sizes.

That said, the Cisco 3750ME and ME3600X give you good 
switching capability + MPLS support. I guess what you'd lose 
out on, though, is the lack of VC or stacking support.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/juniper-nsp/attachments/20101218/d5c80863/attachment.bin>