[j-nsp] Juniper M120 - PPM causing issues for BFD

[Chris Evans]

Had a jtac case been opened to get this fixed?
On Dec 18, 2010 2:56 PM, <sthaug at nethelp.no> wrote:
>> you could try this knob: "set routing-options ppm no-delegate-processing"
>
> Yes, that would make BFD run on the RE. As the original poster assumed,
> the performance is indeed lower.
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Payam Chychi <pchychi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I was wondering if anyone else has had issues with M based routers and
PPM,
>> > if so, any advice would be greatly appreciated.
>> >
>> > Here is my situation:
>> > - I have a m120 router that is now running BFD and IS-IS on a few links
and
>> > OSPF on a few other links (no problem here)
>> > - when I take a backup feb out of backup (N+1 group) and map it to a
fpc,
>> > the router drops all ISIS neighbors.
>> >
>> > A deeper look into the issue showed that ISIS is dropping because of
BFD, a
>> > 3rd look showed that BFD was dieing due to the PPM
>> >
>> > I'm assuming that the issue is related with PPM running on both feb and
re.
>> > Are there any caveats in disabling PPM on the FEB and letting it run
only
>> > on the RE?
>> >
>> > I assume the performance would be lower as its done in software vs the
hw
>> > FEB but i cant imagine the difference to be noteworthy
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Payam
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> BR!
>>
>>
>>
>> James Chen
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp